[email protected]
Cinemablography
  • Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Articles by Category
  • Videographic Essays
  • Contributors
  • Journal
    • Existentialism in Film >
      • The Existential Philosophy of Melancholia
      • The Philosophy of Camus in The Dead Don't Die
      • The Existentialist Subtext of Dear Evan Hansen
      • An Existentialist Reading of "The Turin Horse"
    • A Woman's Perspective: Gender, and Identity in the Romanian New Wave
    • Film Theory Issue 1
    • Film Theory Issue 2
    • Science Fiction
    • Science Fiction Issue 2
    • Pan's Labyrinth
    • Kathryn Bigelow >
      • Opening Scene
      • Supermarket Scene
      • Round Table Discussion
  • Our Work
    • Links

Farha: An Opportunity for Humane Perspective

12/4/2023

 
by Lau Lu-Zheng
Picture
     With the current day’s plethora of anger and malice-fueled news, Darrin J Sallam’s Farha (2022) is a great antidote against the current worldwide bitter sentiments and instead generates empathy toward the victims of tragedies.  Based in Jordan, the writer and director of this film retells stories passed down from the generation before her: aunts, uncles, and grandparents who had lived through what Palestinian Arabs call the Nakba (“Catastrophe” in Arabic) on May 15th, 1948 — the forceful expulsion and displacement of some 750,000 to a million Palestinians from their homes by Zionist militia, and later the Israeli army. This is one of the more significant — but certainly not the only — events that have fueled the Palestinian-Israeli war to what it is now. 

     The timing to watch films such as this has never been more apt: 2023 will mark one of the significant eras of the Palestinian-Israeli issue, and we are bombarded with bitter news from every avenue. While we have plenty of peer-reviewed academic products accessible to us, there is a sense of sympathy that cannot come from words and numbers. Sallam reconciles the contrast of sterile numbers and facts in books and historical timelines to the spoken and recounted stories of her cultural past, creating a rare and deeply profound historical drama that enables the reader and watcher from afar to understand some context to the Palestinian-Israeli war now, in the perspective of survivors.
Picture
     Farha takes the perspective of a bright 14-year-old girl who was promised that she could go to the city and study with the boys to become a teacher and potentially launch a school for girls, a high ambition that was previously rejected by her father. All these hopes were shot down, alongside her neighbors and friends, when the village was threatened with violence and raided. She is locked in a food shelter by her father, sealed in with plaster and forced to wait out the invasion with no sense of time or where her father is.  
​

     The film is narrated from the perspective of the protagonist. Inside the confined mud-walled den, we experience with her the tremors of gunshots, explosions come and go, the shame of having to relieve on the floor less than a meter away from where she sleeps, and the disappointment of realizing that the imprisonment will not be temporary. We feel the fear for the situation in which she is in and then for her loved ones; her alertness, weariness, and hope all begin to slowly meld with the viewer’s. ​
Picture
     The film was accepted by roughly 40 different festivals, receiving praise for a poignant depiction of a historical event. It won awards such as the Red Sea International Film Festival 2021, Toronto International Film Festival 2021, Asia Pacific Screen Awards 2022, and Aswan International Film Festival 2022 among others. It was also sent to the 95th Academy Awards as Jordan’s official entry. Yet, due to its controversial nature, the film was only released in Jordanian theaters last August and was not shown at the 95th Academy Awards. 
 
     We, People, regardless of race, religion, or nationality, have a historically proven knack for allowing our emotions to drive our actions.  Sometimes knowledge, whether it comes from an unofficial news source or a fictionalized film, may be a catalyst to unpleasant actions toward those around us, leading to the addition of more malice into an already problematic world. The focus of Farha is not to condemn any nationalist movement or people group, its ethos to understand and sympathize with the suffering and endangered rather than generate hatred to another. Instead, if there is an opportunity to sympathize with the tales and stories of those who have experienced a portion of the Israeli-Palestinian problem, such as watching the beautifully crafted Farha, it is an opportunity that is good to take.  
Picture

FNAF: The Smash Hit Not for the Masses

11/27/2023

 
By Samuel Shaw
Picture
 This Review Contains Spoilers

     Oftentimes, a film is so highly anticipated, and takes so long to be made, that I begin to question if the film is real or just a large grouping of rumors. Five Nights at Freddy’s (2023) was no exception. Watching multiple studios and directors come and go, the release of the film came over eight years after its initial announcement. It was easy to think this production would never be able to get its footing. 
​
     The long wait for the film to be made can be credited to Five Nights at Freddy’s (or FNAF) creator, Scott Cawthon. After creating the original game in 2014, Cawthon gained a massive fan base, and he was dedicated to creating a story that would pay the proper respect to its source material.Scott Cawthon even joined the film crew as a writer and producer.  Jason Blum, another producer of the film and founder of Blumhouse Productions, stated that the film was made “for the fans and really only for the fans”. This made it clear from the beginning that Cawthon’s intention was not to make a critically successful film, but to make a film that would be accepted by the community he created. 

     Then, the seemingly  impossible happened: After settling on a script, a studio, and choosing Emma Tammi as director, the time had come to make the film. Being the adaptation of a video game franchise I hold dear, I was adamant to be in the theater, alongside friends, watching Freddy and the gang as soon as I could. For added fun, we chose to dress formally, a decision that makes popcorn eating slightly more hazardous. It is worth noting that Scott Cawthon’s formula of fan service was highly successful, as the film earned $80 million in its opening weekend.


     Taking inspiration from several of the FNAF games, the film follows Mike Schmidt (played by Josh Hutcherson) as he does his best to raise his little sister, Abby (played by Piper Rubio) on his own, all while trying to solve the mystery of the kidnapping of his younger brother, Garrett. Desperate for work, Mike takes a security position at the abandoned Freddy Fazbear’s Pizza Place, only to discover that the establishment has a dark history, and an even darker secret. 

    The film employs a very impressive use of practical effects, choosing not to rely on CGI for their animatronics. In fact, the animatronic models used in the film were built by Jim Henson’s Creature Shop (though I do not expect that we will see Freddy Fazbear acting alongside Kermit the Frog any time soon). The animatronics were near identical representations of the ones seen in the game. 
Picture
     Upon its release, the film was immediately polarizing for viewers. Many critics claimed that the plot of the film was lacking, and that it would inevitably get lost in the sea of horror movies just like it. Other, more die hard FNAF fans loved the film for its endless easter eggs and nostalgia factor. In the case of creative liberties taken by the film, there was a mixed response even from the biggest of fans. Most notably, the scene in which the animatronics built a fort with Mike, Abby, and the police officer, Vanessa (played by Elizabeth Lail). Many viewers felt that this portrayal of the innocence of the children who possess the animatronics strayed too far from the horror aspect of the film. Another, more positively received change came from the scene when Vanessa reveals that she is the daughter of William Afton, (played by Matthew Lillard) the evil mastermind behind the children’s disappearance including Mike’s brother. Though this twist may have seen obvious to those unfamiliar with the original story of the video games, those who knew the original story well, and expected the movie to follow that story, never saw it coming.

    The film also received criticism for its rating. The film is rated PG-13 for strong violent content, bloody images, and language. However, many fans have expressed that an R rating would have suited the film better. This has been a constant debate since the PG-13 rating of the film was announced. Many critics and viewers stated that the greater freedom and comes with an R rating would have allowed the movie to be more violent and scary. Other critics believe that the PG-13 rating is better for the mostly  young audience of the film, and stays true to the video games, which have remained tame in the violence over the years. It is also worth mentioning that Scott Cawthon himself is a devout Christian. Before developing the first  FNAF game, Cawthon was known for making faith based games for kids. With this in mind, Cawthon may have chosen to stick to the PG-13 rating out of respect for his Christian faith.

    Despite the  mixed reviews, Five Nights at Freddy’s told a heartfelt story of a young man who would stop at nothing to protect and provide for his sister, as well as find justice for his brother. The film is jam packed with easter eggs, cameos, and jokes to keep the fans of the games entertained, with the occasional scare to satisfy the horror fans. Most of all, Scott Cawthon successfully wrote a love letter to all the kids who grew up being scared by Freddy Fazbear, including myself.

Fionna and Cake: A Show for the Fans

11/20/2023

 
by Jimmy Huston
Picture
   In 2018, the Cartoon Network series Adventure Time ended after ten seasons and over 280 episodes. The series captured the hearts and imaginations of its initial audience of children, teens, and adults. The show's unique sense of humor, memorable characters, and narrative, which became increasingly present and complex as the show continued, all contributed to its appeal. The show had such a strong fanbase that, the “Land of Ooo” and its inhabitants were revisited just two years later, as four one-hour specials, each focusing on a different character, and they were released on HBO Max across 2020 and 2021.  As this series of specials entitled Distant Lands ended, the Adventure Time team announced their next project Adventure Time: Fionna and Cake, and after two years of waiting, the show was finally released in August of 2023.

   The series consists of ten episodes, each roughly 27 minutes long, and follows the multiversal adventures of the titular characters Fionna Cambell (Madeleine Martin) and Cake (Roz Ryan).  Both characters first appeared in season 3, episode 9 of the original show. They come from fanfiction created by Ice King in which all of the beloved Adventure Time characters are gender-swapped. Of course, Fionna and Cake are the stand-ins for Finn and Jake. In their new series, which takes place decades after the original show, they adventure across the multiverse to save their world, joined by Simon Petrakov (Tom Kenny) who was once Ice King before being turned back into a human in the finale of Adventure Time.
Picture
   One of the most notable differences between Adventure Time and Fionna and Cake (2022) is that Fionna and Cake is rated TV-14 while the original was rated TV-PG. Not only does this officially qualify it as adult animation, but it gives it a lot more freedom. An Adventure Time project contains blood and curse words for the first time. This made some fans cautious, as many adult animated shows use these elements as a crutch. Fionna and Cake, however, do not fall victim to these norms. They use violence only when necessary, and the cursing is few and far between and only used by the characters it makes sense for.
Picture
   Speaking of characters, that is this series’ most vital attribute. The character work is nothing short of impressive. The titular characters work extremely well and are large upgrades from their one-dimensional depictions in Adventure Time. Instead of being the female version of Finn as she was initially, Fionna is entirely her own character. She is probably the character audiences can relate to most. Fionna is just a girl doing her best to get through her 9 to 5 while caring for her cat and hanging out with her friends. She also has a lot of depth to her as she is usually adorable and carefree. However, she has a very stubborn side when she feels like something is unjust. She has a “Hero’s heart,” which is probably the biggest similarity between her and Finn. Her best friend and cat, Cake, is also a significant upgrade from her original, one-note portrayal. While not quite as well developed as Fionna, Cake serves as an excellent comic relief and part of some interesting intercharacter conflicts in the middle of the show. By far, the highlight of the series is the character of Simon. Simon is one of the most tragic Adventure Time characters without spoiling. They take his character arc in a unique direction, especially in the second half of the season, and he is responsible for some of the most emotional moments in Adventure Time.  His character alone makes the show worth watching. 
Picture
   Unfortunately, Fionna and Cake’s biggest shortcoming is the pacing, which may result from the fact that the season is only ten episodes. The season starts strong, with the first two episodes being some of the best. However, episodes three and four feel a bit awkward. The show took a little too long to get into the main plot. By episode four, you can tell where it’s headed, so while the episode itself isn’t bad, it feels like you are just waiting to move on. This issue comes back again for the last two episodes of the show. Multiple plots are going on simultaneously in the final few episodes, and it feels like the less impactful, more predictable one gets more focus. The pacing is pretty good throughout the rest of the show, but these few episodes definitely hurt the story's overall flow.

  One potential downside of Fionna and Cake is the low level of accessibility, and I’m not just referring to the fact that it’s a MAX exclusive. The show is made purely for Adventure Time fans. There are many instances throughout the series where a side character who only appeared in a few episodes of Adventure Time or maybe one of the Distant Lands specials, comes into the story and plays a crucial role. They do not explain most of the time and expect the audience to know this world already inside and out. So, when it comes to new fans, this isn’t a show for them. However, playing so heavily into this already existing fanbase who grew up with the original show and are now adults has yielded positive results for the Adventure Time crew. The Adventure Time fandom has had a large revival on social media and is now as passionate about the show as ever. The week-to-week discussions and excitement on social media as episodes aired are proof of this. Hopefully, this energetic response to the series will lead to more new Adventure Time projects in the future.  

Adventure Time: Fionna and Cake is an all-around well-written show that brings an exciting revival to the franchise. It certainly makes up for what it lacks in pacing and certain story elements with memorable and impressively written characters. The show has grown with the audience with its TV-14 rating and more emotional, serious storytelling, making it a must-watch for any Adventure Time fan. However, if you are a little bit less versed in the Land of Ooo and the characters who inhabit it you should do some catching up before giving the show a watch.  
Picture

A Haunting Review, from Venice

11/13/2023

 
by Megan Sechrist
Picture
*This review contains spoilers*

     Kenneth Branagh’s newest Agatha Christie adaptation, A Haunting In Venice (2023), is an adaptation loosely based on Christie’s book, Hallowe’en Party. Agatha Christie is considered one of the greatest mystery writers of all time, but this adaptation seemed to have missed the mark. 
The film follows Hercule Poirot (Kenneth Branagh), a detective who is in self-isolation in Venice. He is visited by an old friend, Ariadne Oliver (Tina Fey), who convinces Poirot to attend a Halloween party with her while she collects information for her newest novel. Upon arrival at the party, the guests immediately feel something off about the house where the party is being held. The host of the party, Rowena Drake (Kelly Reilly) addresses the feeling by telling a ghost story about a group of children who were murdered in the house. She explains that the feeling shared by all the guests at the party must be the spirits of the dead children. However, gathering to tell ghost stories was not the main goal of this party. Rowena had other plans by inviting Joyce Reynolds (Michelle Yeoh) to perform a seance to talk to Drake’s daughter, Alicia, who she claims died by suicide.
​
Picture
     During the seance, it is revealed by Alicia’s spirit that she was murdered by one of the people in the room. This is where Poirot begins his investigation. Poirot and Ariadne begin a sort of “Sherlock and Watson” style of interrogation with each attendee of the scene to get to the bottom of who killed Alicia Drake. This is where the film takes a turn into the classic “whodunit” mystery we all know and love. It is Rian Johnson’s Knives Out (2019) if it occurred in a Spirit Halloween. Throughout the investigation, Joyce and Dr. Leslie Ferrier (Jamie Dornan) are both found dead, an attempt is made on Poirot’s life while he is bobbing for apples, and the pair finally figure out what happened to Alicia Drake. About 40 minutes into the movie, I questioned who the murderer was because I thought I had it figured out, but I was concerned because it seemed like the obvious answer. Turns out, the apparent answer I had predicted was correct. 
​

     Through thorough interrogations, Poirot and Ariadne discover that it was none other than Rowena Drake, who killed her daughter slowly by putting poisoned honey in her tea. It was yet another foreseeable Hollywood murder by an overprotective mother who was jealous of her daughter’s boyfriend. It was also revealed that Rowena was being blackmailed by someone who knew the truth about the murder of her daughter. The young son of the late Dr. Ferrier, Leopold (Jude Hill), saw his father’s medical records on Alicia and started putting the pieces together: She had not jumped off her balcony; rather, she was pushed. I appreciated the addition of the Leopold/Rowena blackmail because it was an actual, Agatha Christie level plot-twist. After being exposed for the murder of her daughter, Rowena tries to escape up the stairs and onto the balcony which she had pushed Alicia from. It is up to interpretation what happens next. From what we, the audience, see, Rowena is pulled off of the balcony by her daughter’s ghost as a sort of revenge for her murder. But Poirot, the one who witnessed this event, is an unreliable narrator, seeing as he had consumed some of the poisoned honey before the encounter, which may have caused him to hallucinate the event entirely. After solving the case and tying up all the loose ends of the investigation, Poirot returns to his office in Venice and begins to work more as a private detective.
Picture
     Overall, A Haunting In Venice was an enjoyable movie. It was not necessarily groundbreaking, but it is a cute little “mystery” if you overlook certain things. Aside from the constantly flickering lights, this was a visually appealing film, which may have just been a problem with the theater I saw it in, but it felt very Hollywood. From the lighting techniques, camera angles, and A-List celebrities that limited the immersion, I wish Branagh had taken a more serious, darker route with the film. And while I do applaud Branagh’s commitment to the Dutch angle, there were too many of them that started to lose touch. The acting in this film was subpar. These are A-list actors who have proven their abilities time and time again, but a lot of their performances fell very flat in this film. Big names like Tina Fey, Kelly Reilly, Kenneth Branagh, and Kyle Allen didn’t quite reach their full potential, yet I wishMichelle Yeoh were in every scene. This movie was what I expected: a weak plot mixed with subpar acting and Hollywood-esque filmmaking techniques. Although I will admit, I never thought I would leave a movie theater with the overwhelming desire to perform a seance on Halloween with Michelle Yeoh and Tina Fey, but here we are!

Past Lives: A Beautiful Story of Fate

11/7/2023

 
by Matt George
Picture
*This Review Contains Spoilers*

   Adding to the long list of heartbreak movies is Celine Song’s directorial debut Past Lives, made in 2023. Produced by A24, it tells the familiar drama story of defective love but in a new and astounding way. The story takes place over 24 years between South Korea, Canada, and the US, spanning languages, creating a seamless bridge between cultures. It shows love at various stages of maturity and how big and small choices affect life’s trajectory. There are three significant time cuts in this film which conveniently lay out the three main acts. It’s untraditional however, since each act has its own story and heartbreak. Together, they capture the beautiful and bittersweet tale of inyeon, the Korean concept of relational fate that binds us all together. 

   12-year-old childhood friends Na Young and Hae Sung share many moments together where they grew up in Seoul, South Korea. Every day they would walk together after school until they reached the dividing walkway, where Na Young would walk up the stairs, and Hae Sung would continue on the road. Their friendship grows and a crush quickly appears, and their parents arrange a small date for them at the park. But just as abruptly as their relationship arises, it leaves, as Na Young and her family emigrate to Canada. It is a fast exit, and both of the children are deeply affected by the sudden drastic change in their lives. Na Young picks the American name Nora and becomes quickly fascinated in the new world she calls home. 

   12 years later, Nora is in grad school in New York City, chasing her dreams of being an artist. Hae Sung has just finished his military service. After coincidental searching, they reconnect and develop a habit of calling each other practically every day. This is great for them both, but slowly they drift apart again as their futures don’t coincide. Eventually they stop talking and go their separate ways to advance their futures. 

   After another 12 years, Nora married Jewish-American writer Arthur, living and working in New York. Hae Sung is no longer with his girlfriend and leaves Korea for a vacation to visit Nora. The last time they saw each other in person was 24 years ago in their hometown which makes this moment surreal for both of them. Hae Sung’s visit causes tension in Nora and Arthur’s relationship, as Arthur wonders if he is Nora’s true love. 

   Nora and Hae Sung are unsure of what they are to each other, and they spend a day together in the city. Hae Sung is invited back to Nora’s apartment to meet Arthur, and they all decide to get dinner and drinks. This brings us to the moment in the film that acknowledges its situation, where Nora and Hae Sung talk in Korean about everything that has happened as Arthur sits in silence. This scene is heartbreaking since their maturity breaks Nora and Hae Sung’s love for each other, but they talk for a long time while Arthur can’t understand them. As the audience, you feel bad for everyone in this scene.    
Picture
   The film ends with Nora walking Hae Sung to his Uber, and they make eye contact for a very long time. As the car arrives, Hae Sung says that they are experiencing a past life, recalling inyeon, the way people have connected in past lives. Nora agrees and ponders if they will finally find love in a future life. Hae Sung leaves, and Nora walks back home, embracing Arthur and crying in his arms. 

   This film brilliantly explores love and the line of fate it rides on. The concept of inyeon runs throughout this whole film and causes us to think about whether there is some divine influence on the fate of Nora and Hae Sung’s meetings. Their lives are so intimately intertwined while only intersecting at three moments. It asks all the questions of circumstance: What if Nora’s family didn’t immigrate? What if they persevered and kept talking in grad school? What if Nora left and went with Hae Sung back to Korea? These questions are un answered, but such is life, looking for answers we won’t find. The time difference of 24 years could also represent hours, as days loop around just like how lives loop around in the Korean view. 

   The performances in this film are also incredible, with the leading actress, Greta Lee, capturing Nora amazingly and heartbreakingly. Teo Yoo’s depiction of Hae Sung is just as good, creating a convincing character struggling with affection. John Magaro’s portrayal of Arthur asks what the audience is thinking, whether Nora and Hae Sung are meant to be and whether their marriage is a strong enough bond to stay together. All the characters in this film feel like real people, and the audience is never taken out of the experience.
Picture
   This film is clearly a passion project reflecting Celine Song’s own life. Her life reflects Nora’s. She was born in South Korea and moved to Canada, she went to grad school and eventually moved to New York with her Jewish-American writer husband and found herself in a bar with a Korean childhood friend and her husband talking about their youth. This inspired her to make this film, but it asks whether Song had a similar internal conflict. 

   Celine Song has created an excellent addition to the film library, which sticks with the audience for weeks after viewing. This film has clear inspirations from projects like Lost in Translation, Before Sunrise, and In The Mood For Love, but it establishes itself as unique among the array of love and heartbreak films. The cinematography by Shabier Kirchner is some of the best work as it captures the film in its nostalgic and beautiful light. Overall, this film explores what is meant to be and how love and human interaction binds us all together.

Aftersun: Why Can’t We Just Stay Here?

11/2/2023

 
by Eli Alderfer
Picture
*This Review Contains Spoilers*

   Aftersun is Charlotte Wells’ 2022 directorial debut starring Frankie Corio and Paul Mescal, leading to Mescal’s Oscar nomination for best actor. Produced by A24, Aftersun is a soberingly dramatic work of visual poetry. Charlotte Wells showcases clear direction and intention within the subtlety of the story. To fully understand the power and beauty of this film, I was compelled to watch it twice despite its heart-shattering poignancy. Aftersun will make you fall in love with cinema, and holds inspiration in filmmaking, forming what I consider to be one of the greatest films of the 21st century.

    Set in the early 1990s, the story follows Callum (Paul Mescal) and Sophie (Frankie Corio) as a father-daughter duo on vacation at a beach resort in Turkey. Sophie spends her days at the resort filming memories on her camcorder, presenting parts of the story through POV footage. Aftersun sets us up for a coming-of-age story about Sophie, but instead a deep narrative about Callum and his battle with depression is unveiled. At the film’s start, we meet Sophie and Callum, who appear content with a solid and loving relationship. As the film progresses, Callum’s depression becomes overwhelming, and we see the effects of that. We see Sophie begin to understand, even at a young age, that her father is struggling. Although the film is subdued and very little happens throughout the story, the slow-burn dramatic style is captivating and filled with so much depth and emotion that it outclasses most modern films. 

    The presentation of perspective throughout Aftersun is the most critical component of the film. On the surface, we see a linear story about a father and daughter, but if we look deeper, we find a more significant interpretation of how the characters are viewed. The film follows a structure of three perspectives: Sophie’s memory, Sophie’s imagination, and the recorded video via the camcorder. The film follows these three perspectives, telling an emotionally captivating story through various formats and imagery. Based on how this narrative is revealed, the character’s engagements depend on the perspective. Scenes shown through the camcorder are authentic, preserved events that replay to fill the gaps of memories lost to time and history. Moments in which Callum and Sophie are together are retold according to Sophie’s imperfect memory, and scenes featuring Callum alone are purely fabricated from Sophie’s imagination, based on what she assumes may have happened when she was not with him. With this untraditional storytelling style, we can better understand Sophie’s perception of her vacation and relationship with her father.
​
Picture
   On the surface, Aftersun is a beautifully shot and masterful drama with minimal excitement: no big explosions, no plot twists, no CGI battles. Simply put, Aftersun is a one-of-a-kind, honest film, a trait complex to come by in modern cinema. To fully understand the film’s brilliance, every detail must be acknowledged. At first, the meaning of the film may be hidden or confusing, but deep down the film represents the manifestation of anxiety, depression, and grief. Paul Mescal’s somber and brutal performance captures the piercing mental pain that Callum endures. As the film progresses, we see the unbearable sense of regret overtake Callum, leading to the beginning of a broken relationship between him and Sophie. Since the separation between him and his wife, Callum begins to believe that he cannot provide the care that Sophie deserves. Callum’s doubts and addictions fuel his depression, eventually breaking him down until he feels as though he is nothing. Callum tries to cope by practicing Tai Chi and spending time with Sophie but his mental health declines rapidly. Callum’s misery is presented when he denies Sophie’s wish to sing karaoke with her, becoming verbally aggressive with her. Sophie understands that her father is troubled with hopelessness and realizes that these may be her last moments with him.

   At the film’s climactic finale, Sophie and Callum share one last dance, as clearly defined by Queen’s “Under Pressure,” which is dramatically remixed for this scene. The song pairs with imagery of Sophie holding onto Callum so painfully tight, pulling on the heartstrings of every viewer. As the song slowly repeats, “This is our last dance…” we realize that this is likely the last time Sophie will ever see her father. The scene cuts between the emotionally slowed dancing and a visual interpretation of loss. The scene flashes in and out just enough to glimpse what it alludes to. With each flash, we see adult Sophie silently screaming and she tries to hold onto Callum, who is falling into the darkness, both literally and metaphorically. The slow pace of young Sophie dancing in soft, warm light contrasts the dark and cold-colored harshness of the representation of the mental void. Sophie’s distraught emotion warns us that she too is falling close to the void. After her vacation with Callum, she began to develop anxiety and depression due to the effect Callum had on her.
Picture
   As the memories of her father begin to fade away with the music, Sophie remembers her last looks with Callum. At the end of their vacation, they wave goodbye at the airport, sharing one last smile. Sophie’s smiling wave is frozen in time as the last frame captured on the camcorder, seen only again by her adult self, reliving the past. The camera transitions from the camcorder footage, to Sophie watching it, to Callum walking away, all in one seamless arc shot. The very final shot quietly shows Callum closing the camcorder and turning away, walking towards a set of double doors. Beyond these doors is the pitch black void, with only the occasional bright light. This final scene is an obvious representation of Callum headed into the darkness of his mind, leading him to self-destruction and presumably the end of his life.
Picture
   The cinematography of Aftersun is innovative, creating stunning scenery and visuals. Aftersun focuses on reflections, which can be seen through the cinematography and the film’s themes. Cinematographer Gregory Oke heightens the story’s meanings through metaphorical values via the compositional use of mirrors, glass, and water reflections. The characters are often visibly interacting with one another, shown through the reflection of an object, such as a TV, which helps to give space between the audience and the characters, showing that Callum is distanced from everyone else. Alongside the reflective compositions, minimalist shots are also incorporated to symbolize the idea that Callum feels insignificant compared to everything else. Every shot and transition in the film is intentionally used to capture how Callum and Sophie feel throughout the story.
Picture
   Aftersun does a phenomenal job of speaking on mental health, specifically men’s mental health. The movie pulls on the audience’s souls, making us care deeply for both Sophie and Callum. The film makes us aware of the pain and struggle that goes along with mental health and how it affects others, especially families. Charlotte Wells did a remarkable job writing and directing this breathtaking film, and the casting of both Paul Mescal and Frankie Corio was perfect. Both actors treated the film like a natural conversation, creating a genuine film. Aftersun is so much more than just a movie. It is an exhibit of love, grief, and bittersweet heartbreak. Wells’ directorial debut will leave you speechless and full of emotions you never knew you could feel, wondering “Why can’t we just stay here?” 
Picture

Elementals: A Persisting Ember in our Hearths.

10/31/2023

 
by Lau Lu-Zheng
Picture
         About 3 months ago, I brought some of my younger cousins to the cinema for wholesome cousin-to-cousin bonding. The show did not matter to us hence, it was a happy coincidence that we stumbled upon a Pixar film that came out a few days before: Elementals (2023).  

As a rule, we make it a point to have zero expectations when we see a film — that way; we get less disappointed if we find it a bad experience (it works in other aspects of life, too, really). Thus, we enjoyed ourselves! Everyone came out zimming with energy, talking about this character and that. We played the film’s soundtrack in the car on the way back (which features the famous record pop artist Lauv).  

The theme lands on an increasingly popular topic in Pixar and Disney: color representation. Soul (2022), Turning Red (2022) and the newest The Little Mermaid (2023) are some to name a few. From the outside perspective, Elementals is a Pixar classic: the inanimate and daily objects turned animate and alive, made to represent persons and problems in our real lives. This straightforward allegory is what built Pixar up from ground zero — from Toy Story (1995), A Bug’s Life, (1998) to Cars (2006).  In this instance, the traditional foundational elements of Eastern culture: Wind, Earth, Water and Fire populate the land, some living harmoniously with each other, some, not so much.  

In this beautifully animated film, Ember (played by Leah Lewis) is the daughter of an immigrant fire family, prejudiced by a foreign country that is a startling danger for fire coexistion. Ember and Wade (Mamoudou Athie), a Water elemental, find themselves in an impossible love, while Ember realizes taking over her father’s shop might not be her dream career.

It was shocking to see the masses of negative critique given to the film on opening week, as well as its prediction to flunk the box office, with an opening week of $30 million for the US and Canada. Heightened by its whopping $200 million production budget (in contrast, Pixar and Disney’s Turning Red and Inside Out were both roughly $170 million), it seemed like another consecutive bomb for the animation powerhouses, coming after the flop of Lightyear (2022).  

Elementals was birthed a little closer to heart than most; written, produced, and directed by Peter Sohn, a second-generation immigrant from Korea. All his life, his parents ran grocery stores and shops to stay afloat, but instead of keeping up the business, Sohn decided to join an Art school. After a good 20 years in Pixar in almost every department (He was nicknamed Mr. Pixar by some of his colleagues), he was given the opportunity to lead the creation of his own film.    

The film took seven years to complete, in which Sohn managed to interview them about their lives as first-generation diaspora — right before they both passed away. However, Sohn persevered with the project, attempting to encapsulate their legacy into the film. Thus, at its release, it was a sorrowful moment to believe that the passion Sohn had put into this film might not have been felt and acknowledged by the audience.  

That is until recently, Elementals rose from the ashes, persisting even through the gloomy storm that Barbenheimer (both released in July 21st) brought about to all other screening films, as well as family-oriented films such as Spiderman: Across The Spider Verse (June 2nd) (P.S: Sohn voice acted as Miles’ roommate!) . Elementals not only survived but surpassed its predicted failure, currently sitting on a worldwide box office of $484 million as well as a great many positive reviews. 

What changed? A spark in the international market that no one could have seen coming.  Little did Sohn know, the nation his parents came from connected deeply to the movie's ethos: Elementals has become Pixar’s most-viewed movie in South Korea, garnering a whopping six million admissions and more on Disney+. Discussing with my small survey group, it was revealed My cousins and I all connected deeply with the orthodox Asian paternal relationship that I found the most refreshing of the show’s representations: from honor-bound filial piety required of children to the heart-wrenching scenes of Ember desiring acknowledgment from her father. It was in this that the South Korean viewers, children and young adults alike found attractive to the movie — a worthy tribute to Sohn’s late parents. All things equal, this aspect is something Sohn can take great pride in etching into Pixar history. 

Ultimately, Elementals is a powerful tale of hardship, unconventional love, and redemption, covering topics such as miscegenation, immigrant prejudice and cultural appreciation. It may not have had a great start, but it indeed went the mile to tell the blazing story the world needs.  
Picture

Banshees of Inisherin: Grief Through Folklore

4/29/2023

 
by Emma Salvato
Picture
For his fourth feature length movie, British-Irish writer-director Martin McDonagh brings back the duo Colin Farrell/Brendan Gleeson, already tried and tested in his 2009 movie In Bruges, the story of two hitmen who are awaiting for orders from their superiors in the Belgian city. Cynical and darkly humorous, The Banshees of Inisherin (2022) sets to explore the themes of sorrow, ambition, and friendship as the last days of the Irish Civil War play in the background.
On the island of Inisherin, a fictional piece of land off of the Irish coast, lives a small community of people; there are farmers, musicians, pub owners, all their lives forcefully linked by the scarcity of land they can occupy. Amongst these people there are Pádraic (Colin Farrell), a farmer who lives with his older sister Siobhán (Kelly Condon) and his miniature donkey Jenny, and Colm Doherty (Brendan Gleeson), Pádraic's best friend and local fiddle player.

On Inisherin, Colm is known as a man of enviable culture: he's a skilled musician and has been able to built the reputation of almost being an academic, his interest for all things that lie beyond the rocky Irish coast manifesting itself through the purchase of Japanese men-yoroi masks and African trumpet horns, enough to decorate his entire house. His knowledge is so vast that the people of the island are quite surprised that the man has not yet tried his fortune on the mainland too, and would rather spend his days playing the fiddle at the local pub and chatting with Pádraic, who is but a lowly countryman with no interest for music and even less for culture and literature.

It's because of these different personalities of theirs, that the people of the island aren't surprised, when Pádraic begins moaning about his friend refusing to speak to him, merely asking if they're "rowing" and telling him to just follow Colm's wish of being left alone once and for all. Despite everybody telling him so, Pádraic cannot bring himself to follow their words: Colm is his best friend, has been so for years, so he needs to know if the man is enraged at him because of something he has said or done.

In one last, brief conversation Colm concedes to him, Pádraic discovers that the reason why the man doesn't want to be his friend anymore because he now considers Pádraic to be dull, and fears that his dullness might hinder his future as a brilliant player and composer. Colm wants to be surrounded by people like him, people who are cultured and engaging, who will stimulate his desire to produce art. Pádraic, as nice as he might be, doesn't inspire anything in him, and therefore he now considers spending time with him as a waste.
Picture
Confused and hurt, Pádraic seeks comfort in Siobhán, who reassures him that he's not dull, he's just nice, and in the company of Dominic Kearney (Barry Keoghan), the slightly slow-minded son of Paedar, the local police officer (Gary Lyndon). Although Pádraic treats Dominic with contempt and considers him to be a dimwit, when he discovers that his father beats him, he doesn't hesitate to house and feed him in his own home, despite his sister's initial objections.

Still, Pádraic is unable to leave Colm alone, and the man, frustrated with the other's constant need of attentions, decides to threaten him: "I have a set of shears at home, and each time you bother me from this day on, I will take those shears and I'll take one of me fingers off with them, and I will give that finger to ya, a finger from me left hand, me fiddle hand, and each day you bother me more, another I'll take off and I'll give you, until you see sense enough to stop, or until I've no fingers left."

Although this promise of self-violence leaves Pádraic shocked, he cannot control his desire to go bother Colm again, and he falls into temptation twice. The first time, when he's drunk, he approaches his former friend and asks him why being nice isn't enough anymore (Colm's answer, snobbish, further highlights the distance between the two men, as he says: "Ah, well... I suppose niceness doesn't last then, does it, Pádraic? But I tell ya something that does last? Music lasts. And paintings last. And poetry lasts."); the second time, he does so because of the information that Dominic wrongly reports to him, according to which Colm, after the scene Pádraic caused in the pub the night before, now considers him to be better than before. Both times, Colm takes a pair of shearing scissors and cuts off his fingers (the former time amputating only one finger of his left hand, the latter all of the remaining ones), throwing them at the door of Páedar and Siobhán's house so that they both can see the damage their family caused.
Picture
In the midst of the men fighting, Siobhán decides that she is done with the life on that small island, and disgusted by the pettiness of the people who inhabit it, and applies for jobs on the mainland, being hired as a clerk of a public library. On the day Colm throws his remaining fingers at their door, Pádraic accompanies her to the port and watches the ferry carry her to Ireland sail thorugh the water.

Already saddened by the departure of Siobhán, Pádraic goes home to find his dear donkey, Jenny, dead: while he was at the port, she found Colm's fingers and began nibbling on them, accidentally choking on one of them and suffocating. Truly enraged for the first time, Pádraic finds Colm at the pub and it's his turn to threaten him: "Your fat fingers killed me little donkey today. [...] Yeah, no, I'm not joking you. So tomorrow, Sunday, God's day, around two, I'm going to call up to your house, and I'm going to set fire to it, and hopefully you'll still be inside of it. But I won't be checking either way."

The following day, as he said at the pub, Pádraic loads his cart with gasoline and oil lamps and drives it to Colm's house, taking the man's dog before it can get injured and then douses his friend's house. Before setting it on fire, he checks through the windows for Colm and even seeing him sitting on a stool, smoking, he goes through with his plan, then watching the house be engulfed by flames.

Later, as he's standing on the beach that faces the coasts of the mainland, Colm reaches him, dirtied with tar but still alive. While they're there, watching the water and the land that war ravaged  for more than a year, Colm makes a comment about how the conflict must be finally coming to an end, prompting Pádric into responding by saying that, from some fights, there is no coming back from.
Picture
Proper to Irish folklore, the banshees are the spirits of cloaked women who appear to whose who are going to soon lose a loved one. These wailing figures (or, rather, "keening," word that comes from the Irish "caointeoireacht," meant to indicate the concept of sorrowful laments) are predictors of death, loudly announcing the death of a family member of a friend. In the movie The Banshees of Inisherin, however, no true banshee appears: these mythical creatures are only a metaphor, a ghost whose presence permeates every second of the story.

From a visual point of view, the specter is represented by Mrs McCormick (Sheila Flitton), an elderly woman who lives in a cottage by the lake. Clad in black clothes that are traditional to Irish costume, she wanders in front of the Súilleabháin siblings whenever they are in pain or uncertain about their future.

When the siblings are first introduced, they are already grieving: in a conversation between Siobhán and Mrs McCormick, it's revealed that both of their parents died seven years prior in an unspecified sudden accident that left them alone; their impossibility to process their parents' death is shown by having them still sleeping their childhood bedroom, in twin beds that are almost too small for them to rest comfortably in. Throughout the story, this feeling of oppression and sorrow only hightens: for Pádraic, such feelings are born out of his broken friendship with Colm (and, later on, caused by Jenny's death), while Siobhán is already grieving herself, as she worries she will be stuck on Inisherin for her entire life, cursed into sharing all human interactions with that group of bitter island people.
Picture
Colm too, although not as blatantly, is grieving. His sorrow, rather than being caused by outside sources, finds its roots within: he's desperate to become a famous musician, to be respected and beloved and admired, but he's subconsciously aware that his place is nowhere but Inisherin. Even his culture, for which he's widely praised, is put into discussion by none other than Siobhán herself, who, after listening to his speech about how he wants to be like Mozart, known for his music rather than his niceness, corrects him by telling him that Mozart was born in the Eighteenth Century, and not in the Seventeenth as he stated.

His sudden hatred for Pádric is nothing more than self-hatred he expresses by attacking his best friend, putting him at fault for his own actions. Colm already carries the desire of cutting his own fingers off, an extreme measure to put a drastic end to his career of fiddle player before what he fears the most can happen: discover that he's not as talented enough to make it.
Picture
The film is a two-hour long metaphor for the Irish Civil War, which, in The Banshees, appears as a background element. The conflict was fought by two Irish groups: IRA (the Irish Republican Army), which wanted Ireland to be its own, fully independent state, and the Irish Free State, which believed that Ireland should've remained part of the British Empire. Although the war was brief, as it only lasted eleven months (began in June 1922 and ended in May 1923), the consequences were dire: it was a particularly bloody conflict in which many, both soldiers and civilians, lost their lives, and that forced people to take a stand against their fellow countrymen. The divisions and tensions between these two faces of Ireland brought, on the long line, to The Troubles, which plagued the North of the country up to the late Nineties.

At the end of the movie, despite the both of them having lost everything because of one another (Pádraic lost his sister and his donkey, Colm lost his fingers and his home), Pádraic speaks the truth: some conflicts cannot be solved, and not everything that has happened between them can be ignored so that things can go back the way they were. In the same way, the conflict that took place between 1922 and 1923 changed the history of Ireland forever, making it impossible for its citizens to resume how they used to live before it.

As Colm said towards the end of the story, now earth is struck by enough grief for the banshees watch, amused and silent, as humans only bring more pain and death to one another.

Martin Eden: The Handsome Desperation of Individualism

4/14/2023

 
by Emma Salvato
Picture
This essay contains spoilers

Hunched over a voice recorder, Martin Eden (Luca Marinelli) mumbles his disappointment for modern society: "Those who build prisons express themselves with far less clarity than those who build freedom," he says in a drawl, exhaustion making it impossible for him to keep his eyes open. As he begins to fold over the table, unable to support the invisible weight he carries onto his shoulders, the scene abruptly cuts to stock footage from the early Twentieth Century, people smiling and waving at the camera, excited by the novelty of the contraption in front of them.
Picture
This is how Pietro Marcello's Martin Eden (2019) begins: depicting its titular character nearing his end, apathetic and drained, disillusioned with the reality that surrounds him, and cruelly juxtaposing him to people who are able to find happiness in the simple act of being filmed.

Marcello, a young Italian director whose body of work mostly focuses on documentaries, took on the ambitious task of adapting Jack London's final (and most autobiographical) novel for the screen, modifying it to fit a reality he could better understand and represent. Rather than being set in the San Francisco of the early Twentieth Century, Marcello's Martin Eden takes place in the Southern Italy of an unspecified decade (the presence of flared pants and tightly collared shirts hints at it being set after the Protests of 1968, a time of collective disillusionment for all those who believed revolution was possible), but is nevertheless able to explore the story and themes presented in its source material.
Picture
After its abrupt beginning, the movie settles for a more traditional narrative style: the plot is spun back of several years, before Martin could become successful and discover discontent. The second time he is introduced to the audience, he is presented as a strong and handsome sailor, charming and carefree. His lack of formal education doesn't bother him, nor does the hard labor that pays for his meals.

His destiny changes when, the morning after a party, he saves a boy, Arturo Orsini (Giustiniano Alpi), from being beaten, and is invited to his house for lunch as a sign of gratitude. Arturo is not like the ones Martin was raised alongside with, initiated to the harsh lives of manual laborers while still in childhood: he was born into a wealthy family who owns mansions, cars, cushy lifestyles that allow for its members to spend their lives focusing on academia. In Arturo's home, Martin is incredibly out of place, his rugged clothes and swarthy appearance unable to fit within the pristine and delicately constructed world of the Orsinis, a world in which everything is fragile, pale, expensive.

Although Martin is self-aware enough to recognize the class differences between him and the Orsinis, his ignorance allows for him to deceive himself into thing that they, just like anybody else he has previously encountered, can be charmed into thinking of him as a peer with a couple of good chats.

It's Elena (Jessica Cressy), Arturo's older sister, who makes him realize that this is not the case: after a brief conversation before lunch, in which the woman corrects his French pronunciation in a rather patronizing manner, Martin finds himself smitten and tries to seduce her (in the scene right before this one, Martin was shown effortlessly flirting with another girl, indicating that, for him, it's almost a habit, to use his charms and good looks for such purpose), but Elena immediately makes it clear that she won't stoop down her social position for anyone.

If Martin doesn't abandon his working class roots and rises to Elena's social class, she will never pursue a relationship with him.
Picture
Resolute in his quest to prove Elena his devotion, Martin begins using all his wages to purchase books and educate himself, going as far as attempting to take the exams necessary to receive an elementary school diploma.

However, what began as a journey to seduce a woman quickly evolves into one of self-discovery: through his process of schooling, Martin reaches a new level of self-awareness, of understanding of the social class divide between him and the Orsinis, of the concepts of proletariat and bourgeoisie.

Frustrated by his incapability to earn an elementary school license, Martin sets a new goal for himself: he'll become a writer, and when his first work will be published, he'll go back to Elena and will ask for her hand, strong of his worth as an intellectual. Cargo ships and Naples abandoned in favor of a simple life spent renting a room in the house of a widowed woman, Martin writes and writes and writes, struggling by as he chips at all his savings, getting more and more discouraged as all the newspapers and publishing houses he submits his works to don't deem it worthy of publication

Even the letters he receives from Elena are a form of disappointment: she thinks his dream of gaining social footing by becoming an author is foolish, useless, and although the snippets of his writing he sends her are beautifully written, they are not in her taste. The differences between them are solidified through an in person encounter that takes place when Martin travels back to Naples for a few days: even now that he is educated and can mingle with the friends of the Orsinis without much effort, Elena thinks of the themes of his writing as crass, violent, unable to depict reality. Frustrated, Martin grabs the woman's arm and jostles her around, dragging her through the streets he was raised in, where prostitutes and thieves abound, scaring her.

The reality Elena is accustomed to is simply one that is for the very few, her privilege made her blind and deaf to the struggles of the normal people, and even now that Martin has presented her with them, she would still prefer to close her eyes and ignore them, finding them undignified.

Fully disillusioned with Elena and the feelings he has for her, Martin abandons her and goes back to writing.
Picture
The climax of the story is presented little after: Martin, after a severe illness, finally receives a letter of congratulations from a publishing house, its editors so enthralled by the work he submitted that they'd like to publish everything else he has written.

Now that his talent has been discovered, Martin becomes an overnight sensation, pays back all his debts, keeps writing while the flame still burns. With the help of Russ Brissenden (Carlo Cecchi), an eccentric older writer he met at a party held by the Orsinis, he navigates the world of success, and learns an extremely important lesson: he has to fight for those who can't, for those who, just like Martin at the beginning of the story, don't recognize the inferiority their ignorance and low economic status gives them within society. Martin's unique position in the world, that of a man who was able to rise against all odds, allows him to be their voice. "How many people do you see starve to death or go to jail because they're nothing but wretches, slaves, ignorant and stupid?" Russ asks him. "Fight for them, Martin."

Initially, he tries to do so, participating in conferences organized by unions, but soon enough his face and words are noticed by a journalist who writes an article about him, leading to Martin being misunderstood and disliked by many for his political views, which are branded as being those of a communist. The last spark of the Martin that was dies when Russ suddenly commits suicide, leaving him to navigate the world that wants to tear him apart in complete solitude.
Picture
The more Martin's works are praised and paid, the more he finds himself alienated from his roots. He doesn't belong to the working class anymore, his days as a sailor long gone, but is also unable to properly fit in the society he was so desperately wanted to join, as he is aware that they see his works about the poor and struggling as nothing more than fantasies they can entertain themselves with.

Life embitters him, further makes him sink into disillusionment. Now wealthy, he purchases a luxurious apartment that resembles the Orsinis' mansion and dresses only in the finest of clothes, bleaches his hair to be blonde (a characteristic that, at the beginning of the story, was discussed as being a recognizable sign of someone belonging to the bougeoise class), hires the last longtime friend he is still in contact with (Nino, played by Vincenzo Nemolato), but his new state of indifference and exhaustion turns him ugly. Like the nobles who spent their days lounging at the Palace of Versailles, he too can pull his teeth out, blackened and rotten.

On the day he is supposed to leave for the United States to promote his new book, he meets Elena for one last time and then goes to the beach, enters the water, and swims until the end credits begin rolling.
Picture
Marcello's filming style is saturated with his past as a documentary-maker: the shots are mostly handheld, their target seemingly that of simply archive the rise into stardom of this Neapolitan writer.

Of the shots realized with the use of a tripod, the more notable ones are those depicting Elena's letters: to avoid the stereotypical scene of Martin reading them while a voice-over tells the audience what was written, they were realized by making Jessica Cressy stand in front of a bright red wall (a color that, in the palette of the movie, seldomly appears) and look directly into the camera as she recites out loud their contents.

The way this shot is set can remind of the sorrowful scenes presented in Ingmar Bergman's  Cries and Whispers, a movie from 1972 whose plot revolves around two sisters (and a maid) grieving the death of the third one. The film, whose plot is divided into four chapters, allows each of these female characters to have their own part to better display the anguish they are going through. Each part begins with a shot similar to those of Jessica Cressy reading the letters: the actress, the one whose character is going to dictate the point of view of the next part of the story, stands in front of a bright red wall and looks into the camera.

Although the story is never told from Elena's point of view, it is easy to see why Marcello would choose to be inspired by such a scene: in both movies, those moments signal the beginning of a discussion regarding death, loss, and grief, and in Martin Eden, the latter part of the plot is spent crying the identity the titular character lost.
Picture
Martin Eden is, most of all, a story of identity and class struggles.

Its titular character is initially presented as being sure of both his personhood and status: he is a hard-working sailor, his body is marred by the scars of past fights, his education level is low but functional, his wages are enough to keep him fed and clothed. In the ignorance that Elena considers to be inferior, Martin is content. It's when the status quo is shaken, that he begins drowning and loses his sense of self: those things that were normal, to his eyes, are now unfair injustices he has to oppose himself to.

As the minute count of the movie advances and the story progresses, Martin's hatred for himself grows, further cultivated by the notion that he has brought this situation upon himself for a woman who, simply, couldn't love nor understand him.

Ultimately, Martin Eden makes its audience pose questions about themselves, their position in society, and if they are willing to ask themselves questions about them both.
Picture

A Jump-cut in History: How Breathless Revolutionized Filmmaking

3/27/2023

 
by Hope Roberts
Picture
In 1960, director Jean-Luc Godard’s crime, drama film Breathless was released. The plot follows a man called Michel (Jean-Paul Belmondo), who is on the run after killing a policeman. Not knowing where to turn, Michel resorts to asking his American journalist girlfriend (Jean Seberg) to run away with him.

The film is not only revered for its intense plot, but for its stylistic acting and editing techniques too. Throughout, there are many long takes in which the actors improvise off of one another and, at times, it is edited with numerous jump cuts that cue “jump forwards” in time have occurred and that are able to create a rich and full story for the audience to dive into.


The strange and innovative techniques that were established in this film have given it the reputation of one of the classics of world cinema.

Picture
There are many instances in which a writer can incorporate an allusion into their work, but they all are to be placed to serve a purpose. To put it simply, “[A]n allusion is an indirect reference” (Irwin 287). However, in this case, we are more closely examining literary allusions: indirect references that are utilized to help readers or viewers keep certain people, places, events, other literary works, or any source in mind when reading or watching the material. These references can form an association within one’s mind. Directors and screenwriters can influence their audiences through the use of allusions. In the case of Breathless, there are multiple allusions that Godard implements throughout the film that could contain various meanings.

The opening frame of the film is dedicated to Monogram Pictures, a production company that is well-known for creating and releasing B-movies such as Montana Incident (1952, dir. Lewis D. Collins), a famous Western about two railroad surveyors, and Suspense (1946, dir. Frank Tuttle), a noir-drama about a man who works for an ice-skating magnate.

Godard could have included this frame for a multitude of reasons: he might have been paying homage to the company itself for releasing movies that could be seen as subpar and giving them the credit they deserve, or he might have also put it in as an Easter egg for film buffs, to make them excited about the story to come. Personally, I believe that Godard added these frames because of the former: Monogram Pictures was known for not making ground-breaking films, and its placement at the beginning of the movie could be a subliminal message. One of the most important aspects of watching a movie, in order to enjoy it, is by going into it with the right mindset. When people go into a Hollywood movie, they do so certain expectations, and if those expectations are not met, they will most likely leave the theater feeling disappointed.

By referencing a B-movie company right away, the director might have been trying to get the audience to subtly think of the film as being on the same level as a B-movie without them realizing or trying to make a commentary on B-movies in general. This way, the viewers would’ve gone into the movie with a lower set of expectations, causing its appeal to strike a wider audience.

If, however, it is the latter option, Godard might have just had a great deal of respect for cinema and Monogram Pictures in general, and wanted to show his appreciation by paying homage to it at the beginning of his own work.
Picture

Overall, I do not believe that Godard went into creating this film with the goal of violating filmmaking conventions as a way of creating shock and surprise. If he wanted to do so, he could have gone and pushed the limit much further than how he ended up doing. However, as it turns out, it was not in Godard’s original plan to implement the editing technique that made Breathless so widely known. “His jump-cut technique […] like most innovations, it came about accidentally: the rough cut was too long, and Godard and his editors hit upon the idea of snipping out the extraneous linkages in storytelling” (Rainer 1).

Despite all the praise the film and those who had worked on it received, the jump cuts were never actually something that was planned, but rather decided upon in the last stage of post-production. So, Godard did not set out to try to purposefully mess with his audience: he did so in order to adhere to the runtime requirements. In the long run, the decision ended up being extremely productive for the crew due to the massive turnout the film has received over the years. They were able to create a new technique of filmmaking and a different take on storytelling while still keeping a cohesive plot.

The way in which Godard and his crew made this film incoherent-like almost reflects the way of the environment at the time: “[T]he French [...] tend to be drawn to ideas, while the English [United States] distrust them, with the result that English art is often less intellectually informed than one would wish” (Cohen). When viewing the film, keep this in mind: it makes sense for the plot and acting to not be always straight-laced, as they were never meant to be.

Similarly to the rough jump cuts throughout the film, the editing is not the only aspect of Breathless that stands out: the performances from the main actors are not what one would classify as following the traditional standard of characterization and acting.

The most obvious way in which the two actors depart from the standard of acting is that there are many scenes in which the two engage in improvisation. With improv, actors have little to no rehearsal because it is something that has to come in an instant. With the newly created lines, the other actor has to make split-second decisions on how to emote and what their next line should be. Without the use of a script, the activity is no longer “typical” acting, but whatever the actors can think up on their own. The dispensation of rehearsal in favor of improv causes two major problems that can make the acting unrealistic.
Picture
The first issue that arises from the situation are the awkward pauses between the actors: because they do not have a script, they are forced to come up with their own reactions and responses to what the other is saying or doing, which is nearly impossible to do without awkward pauses and causes the scenes to come across as unrealistic and not what one would typically expect from a movie. It may seem as though the pauses would better reflect real life, due to real life not being scripted, but this film is not exactly trying to emulate reality. If so, it would be a documentary or, at the very least, a documentary-esque movie. However, since it is not, there are certain liberties that one takes with film, a certain suspension of disbelief.

The second major problem that can result from doing improv is that there is no guarantee that what is said will connect to and support the plot. The greatness of screenplays is oftentimes based onto the fact that every aspect of it either factors or plays an important part in the story. If the actors have to improvise the majority of their lines, there is a good chance that all the acting will do is merely pad out the runtime while adding nothing meaningful to the plot.

On the other side of the argument, the improvisation might benefit the film in that it is not traditional and will make itself stand out amongst other films of that time (and even today). 

However, while Godard allowed his actors to interpret their lines as they wished, he did have a plan to keep the story on track. “Coutard [the cinematographer] has stated that the film was virtually improvised on the spot, with Godard writing lines of dialogue in an exercise book that no one else was allowed to look at. Godard would give the lines to Belmondo and Seberg while having a few brief rehearsals on scenes involved, then filming them” (Matthew).

By giving his actors notes, Godard was able to keep a form of consistency to the plot while keeping that “natural” feel of improvisation.

Picture
Breathless can be seen as having an overall awkward tone due to both the improvised long takes and the inclusion of numerous jump cuts, as it is strange to combine the two so heavily in a single body of work due to their juxtaposed nature, which causes disorientation.

Long takes are typically employed so that the audience can have a better understanding of the environment, the characters, and the plot while providing a more realistic take for the viewers, while jump cuts remove aspects from the plot, giving the impression that there is a hole in between shots, causing a sudden change that ignites feelings of confusion and agitation. By choosing to film and edit this way, Godard presents a stark contrast between the scenes in which these techniques are employed, and forces the audience to pay closer attention to what is and isn’t important.
Picture
When viewing Breathless, it is easy to see the influences of neorealist French filmmakers such as Jean Renoir and of realist film theory that were employed by Godard. Neorealist films tend to represent modified versions of reality, which this film does, but there are many instances in which the extent of that realism is pushed past the boundaries of what can and cannot be considered realistic too.

When considering wherever Breathless contains anything realistic or not, the answer to that is definite: certain aspects of the plot are heavily influenced by real-life events. Francois Truffaut, a collaborator of Godard, “[H]ad been inspired by a true story that had fascinated tabloid France in 1952, when a man named Michel Portail, a petty criminal who had stolen a car, shot a motorcycle policeman who pulled him over, and then hid out for almost two weeks [...]. Portail had an American journalist girlfriend who he had tried to convince to run away with him” (Hitchman and McNett). So while the more specific details of what happened when portail was in hiding and the conversations he had with others may not be an exact replica of what truly occurred, the basic concept of the man is inspired by a news story from the time.

Godard’s fascination with the idea of life as depicted by the medias is what inspired the story based on real events mixed with fictional overdramatization. While the news does report on events, some tend to tell only the more dramatic aspects, overexaggerating them too in order to increase viewership, a style and tone of storytelling that Godard wished to replicate with his film.

Despite it being over sixty years old, Breathless should still be considered by today’s viewers an innovative and dynamic piece of cinema. Wheeler Winston Dixon claims that: “Seen today, Breathless seems primitive, classic, not at all the audacious ground-breaker it seemed to be in 1959. The jump cuts which were so radical then are now a staple of MTV.” There are many flaws that can be pointed out in Dixon’s argument. His reasoning as to why Breathless can no longer be seen as innovative hinges on the belief that, because the techniques that made the film stand above the rest during its time are now seen on the average television program and have become basic methods that are frequently utilized, then they make the film lose all the creativity and innovation it held in the past.
Picture
Instead, I would argue the complete opposite of what Dixon is trying to convince his readers of. The jump cuts might have never become the staple the are today if it were not for films like Breathless, which took a chance at trying something new and stylized. Furthermore, if Dixon’s logic is to be followed regarding every film that invented techniques that are now considered to be mainstream, then the argument could extend to other innovative pieces such as Citizen Kane (1941, dir. Orson Welles), which is regarded as one of, if not the, greatest films of all time. Responsible for the establishment of countless new innovations in cinema history, this film is most notable for the application of deep focus, which is a cinematic technique utilized by many filmmakers nowadays. Therefore, does this somehow take away from the film that did it first? Should Citizen Kane be viewed as primitive and no longer ground-breaking simply because the incredible systems they created are now common practice?

These films should not be insulted because their techniques have become mainstream, but praised for it. Because of the crews who worked on these films, people today have so many more tools in their arsenal to make great movies. Dudley Andrew makes an interesting point when he states that “Breathless belongs to that very short list of films that stunned audiences in their own time and continue to stun us today.” While the utilization of jump cuts is much more prominent in today’s time, I cannot recall a film or television show that has implemented them in the same way as Breathless. Watching this film was a bizarre and wonderful experience, and it still stuns me with the creative choices that were settled upon.


WORKS CITED
  • Cohen, Paula Marantz. “The Potency of ‘Breathless’: At 50, Godard's Film Still Asks How Something This Bad Can Be so Good.” American Scholar, vol. 78, no. 2, 2009, pp. 110–114., https://doi.org/https://web.p.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=4&sid=4e3b2825-f286-4a51-bce1-bf5edd6ce209%40redis&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#AN=37155447&db=asn.
  • Hitchman, S, and A McNett. “Breathless (a Bout De Souffle) - Jean-Luc Godard.” Newwavefilm, http://www.newwavefilm.com/french-new-wave-encyclopedia/breathless.shtml.
  • Irwin, William. “What Is an Allusion?” Journal of Aesthetics & Art Criticism, vol. 59, no. 3, Mar. 2001, https://doi.org/https://web.p.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=11&sid=cefa381d-2bc9-476b-bd80-cb4c2b483caf%40redis.
  • Matthew. “Breathless (1960).” Classicartfilms, http://www.classicartfilms.com/breathless-1960.
  • Rainer, Peter. “Breathless: Movie Review.” Christian Science Monitor, June 2010, p. 1. 

<<Previous
Forward>>

    Archives

    October 2024
    April 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    July 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.