Cinemablography@gmail.com
Cinemablography
  • Home
  • About
  • Journal
    • Existentialism in Film >
      • The Existential Philosophy of Melancholia
      • The Philosophy of Camus in The Dead Don't Die
      • The Existentialist Subtext of Dear Evan Hansen
      • An Existentialist Reading of "The Turin Horse"
    • A Woman's Perspective: Gender, and Identity in the Romanian New Wave
    • Film Theory Issue 1
    • Film Theory Issue 2
    • Science Fiction
    • Science Fiction Issue 2
    • Pan's Labyrinth
    • Kathryn Bigelow >
      • Opening Scene
      • Supermarket Scene
      • Round Table Discussion
  • Blog
  • Articles by Category
  • Contributors
  • Videographic Essays
  • Our Work
    • Links

End-Times Emotions In Seeking a Friend for the End of the World

3/28/2017

1 Comment

 
Picture

    Lorene Scafaria’s Seeking a Friend for the End of the World (Scafaria, 2012) combines two disparate genres; the disaster film and the romantic comedy. The psychological processes which bring out emotional responses from viewers are all at play here. The film uses music and color in particular to take viewers through the complete range of human feelings. It blends its two genres into an enjoyable experience but suffers from faults such as characterization problems and oversentimentality.
   
Seeking a Friend for the End of the World is a romantic comedy whose plot is set in motion when a comet named Matilda begins to hurtle towards Earth. Most of the film’s characters react by having as much fun and getting as drunk as possible before the collision. Steve Carrell’s character is a depressed, listless man named Dodge whose wife recently ran out on him. He is having an even harder time than usual finding any sort of meaning in life until he meets Keira Knightley’s character, the vibrant and hopeful Penny. She is heartbroken at the idea of not seeing her family in England anymore and, when a dangerous riot breaks out the next morning, Dodge promises to take her to them. Thus begins a road trip of emotional growth and increasing romantic connection.    
   
Seeking a Friend for the End of the World manages to express practically the entire range of human emotions in its hour and 41 minute runtime, from pity for Elsa the maid to romance to ecstatic mania at the crazy Friendly’s restaurant. How can a movie, which is nothing but projections on a screen combined with sound waves, create such emotion in a viewer? It is partially a result of psychological processes in the human brain. For instance, the mirror rule states that one should mimic visual input they see (i.e. smile if a character on screen is smiling, cry if they are crying, etc.), and the success rule says that it is a good idea to do something that was successful in the past (i.e. flinch if something on screen is thrown in your direction) (Pawloski, 2014).    
   
How does Seeking a Friend for the End of the World specifically show emotion? Firstly, it uses well-chosen music. The happy or “major key” and sad or “minor key” moments one experiences in real life can be made even more emotional when expressed on a screen with the proper music (Pawloski, 2014). Seeking a Friend for the End of the World chooses its tunes well, makes music a central part of Penny’s character, and reuses songs to create sound associations in viewers. Secondly, it is almost a film split into two halves, and these are distinguished emotionally using color. The first half lasts from when the comet is announced and Dodge feels alone to right before his trip with Penny begins. The second half is the remainder of the film. In the first half, the colors are much more muted and grey, with a melancholy feel. The rest of the film has a brighter, sunnier color scheme to express the light she is bringing into his life. Two scenes that create an example of this split are the grey and hollow “party scene” from the first half and the bright, yellow beach scene from the second. The only exceptions to this general rule come at a few necessary moments, such as when Dodge almost gives Penny up.    

    Despite its powerful expressions of emotion, Seeking a Friend for the End of the World does fail in some areas. One weakness is Penny’s characterization as a manic pixie dream girl, or a “kooky, artsy... girl who exists solely in the fevered imaginations of sensitive writer-directors to teach broodingly soulful young men to embrace life and its infinite mysteries and adventures” (Handy, 2015). This makes sense, as she is meant to bring life and happiness into Dodge’s dwindling life. Still, it detracts from her character and makes it harder for the audience to feel for the couple. The other weakness comes from a scathing review of the film. It may be correct in saying it has “more sap than black comedy,” which is odd in a disaster film (Handy, 2015). The first half is as black as its color scheme, but as soon as Dodge gets in the car with Penny, the film seems to be trying to remind viewers that this is indeed a romantic comedy. Sappy love stories are why audiences go to see entries in this genre, but a deeper, more nuanced development of Penny and Dodge’s connection would have helped the film and added to its emotional impact.
    Seeking a Friend for the End of the World is a unique attempt that tries but does not completely succeed at blending two genres and adding something new to the repetitive world of romantic comedies. Its strong point is its ability to make viewers feel a full range of emotions, even for characters that could have been further developed. It does so through effective use of music and colors. It also seems to know what the requirements of each genre are but only provides one in each of its halves (disaster movie first half, romantic comedy second half). Still, this is a worthwhile watch for fans of either genre.
                                                                             Works Cited
1. Handy, Bruce. "Seeking a Friend for the End of the World: The Worst Movie of Its Generation." Vanity Fair. Vanity Fair, 29 Jan. 2015. Web. 23 Mar. 2017.
2. Pawlowski, A. "Your Brain on Movies: Why Films Make Us Cry, Flinch and Cheer." TODAY.com. TODAY, 02 Nov. 2014. Web. 23 Mar. 2017.
3. Seeking a Friend for the End of the World. Dir. Lorene Scafaria. Netflix. N.p., n.d. Web. Mar. 2017.

1 Comment

"I Wish I Knew How To Quit You:" Hypermasculinity in Heath Ledger Films

3/10/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
A photo collage of Ledger's most noteworthy roles
​(from Comicbook.com - http://comicbook.com/2015/01/22/heath-ledger-passed-away-7-years-ago-today/)

Picture
By Megan Hess
​In 2018, it will be ten years since the passing of one of American cinema’s most promising foreign imports, a man whose career was characterized by variety. Over the near-decade Heath Ledger worked in the US, he dabbled in a variety of different genres - Shakespearian adaptations, historical dramas, biopics, and superhero films, to pick a few of the most notable genres in his filmography. In his biographical piece for New York Magazine written after Ledger’s death, Chris Norris calls him, “a probing and adventurous character actor—someone who said he had purposely “taken the blonde out of his career” - meaning, he wanted to distance himself from the “pretty-boy” image that his American debut, 10 Things I Hate About You (Junger, 1999), brought him (1).  Despite the supposed randomness in his selection, Ledger seemed continually drawn to roles that dealt with the effects of hypermasculinity on men – parts that portrayed characters boxed in by the way society tells men they should be. He hardly ever played the regular guy, but always fell into overtly masculine archetypes: the juvenile delinquent, the cowboy, the soldier, the knight, the musician. These social roles influence what people think about men and how they perform gender. If gender and gender roles are a spectrum, as many believe, with “masculine” at one end, and “feminine” at the other, men who occupy these roles are expected to be all the way over on the “masculine” side, exemplifying manhood. That is why I use the term “hypermasculine” during my analysis.
Ledger’s ultra-manly roles started before the two films he is most famous for, the ones which will be the primary focus here: Brokeback Mountain (Lee, 2005) and The Dark Knight (Nolan, 2008). In fact, his American breakout – the one which got him labeled as just another hunky young star -  began the pattern. In 10 Things I Hate About You, a modernized teen adaptation of Shakespeare’s The Taming of the Shrew, Ledger plays Patrick Verona, a tough young man shrouded by cigarette smoke and crazy rumors (“I heard he ate a live duck once,” one character says to another. “Everything but the beak and feet,” the other responds) -  the basic teenage delinquent archetype complete with long hair and a black leather jacket. As such, the main male characters are afraid to approach him at first, but, as both the viewers and Kat Stratford (Julia Stiles), 10 Things’ female lead, discover, he is more capable of great sensitivity than sadism – a person to trust, rather than fear.  
Picture
Patrick's relationship with Kat (Julia Stiles) brings out his goofy, sweet, side (10 Things I Hate About You, Junger, 1999)
​The conversation about male identity that starts in 10 Things... carries over into Ledger’s later films. Brokeback Mountain exemplifies the archetype of hypermasculine man with a hidden\inaccessible emotional core, and is the most self-aware of the damage that comes from societal pressure, especially of this variety. Annie Proulx, who wrote the short story the film is based on, chafes against the “urban critics’’” description of the film as “a tale of two gay cowboys” (Proulx 131) because of how that label sidesteps the “destructive rural homophobia” Proulx believes is the pulse of the narrative– a “destructive rural homophobia” that goes so deep the characters inflict it on themselves (Proulx 130). After their first sexual liaison, Ennis (Heath Ledger) tells Jack (Jake Gyllenhaal) “It’s a one-shot thing we got going here” and “I ain’t no queer;” Jack responds to the latter with “Me, either” (McMurty and Ossana, 20). Neither character intends to take that sexual relationship off the mountain, but, as Proulx says “they both fell into once-in-a-lifetime love” – albeit a “once-in-a-lifetime love” they cannot express to the broader society (Proulx 130). Ennis and Jack are very much constrained by their culture and what it expects of them as men: both sexually and emotionally. Proulx praised Ledger’s performance, saying he “knew better than I how Ennis felt and thought” and his “intimate depiction of that achingly needy ranch kid builds with frightening power” (Proulx 137). While Jack is not unusually emotional for a man of that time, he is a little freer with his feelings than Ennis – partly because he’s more talkative. But for what Ledger’s character lacks in emotional expressiveness, he makes up in emotional intensity. Much like Lee Chandler, Casey Affleck’s Oscar-winning protagonist from Manchester by The Sea (Lonergan, 2016), Ennis is harboring a lot of deep and strong feelings, but has no idea how to bring them to the surface – at least, not in a healthy way. He channels them all through the conduit of anger, and goes from punching walls to other people. He never hits his wife, Alma (Michelle Williams) but drives her away with that same anger, expressed alternatively in words and silence. He uses it to keep Jack at a distance – always shutting him down when he tries to broach the idea of them getting a ranch together – and it almost brings their relationship to an end. Annie Proulx’s character – and Heath Ledger’s interpretation of him - may be a fiction, but the way he handles his emotions is all too true to life. 
Picture
Even when in the company of his greatest love, Ennis Del Mar (Heath Ledger, right) looks pensive - like he's feeling a thousand different things, but just doesn't want to emote them - and doesn't know how (Brokeback Mountain, Lee, 2005)
​Several years after Brokeback Mountain, Ledger picked up a role entirely different from those preceding it, and the one that would become his most iconic. Ennis Del Mar is driven by his fears, feelings, and relationships, but the Joker has no such motivations. As Alfred (Michael Caine) says in the film “some men just want to watch the world burn” (Nolan et al. 229). As a result, he has no ties. Most young male audience members can’t relate to the Joker, but they do admire him. He cares about nothing but himself, and, as a result, is unaffected by the culture and its requirements for those in male bodies. While the Joker possess many negative attributes that would be worrisome for viewers to aspire to adopt (mainly his total disregard for the value of other human lives), it also says a lot about the way our society is constructed that young men yearn to be like the Joker just to have his freedom. 
Picture
As the Joker, Ledger personifies chaotic apathy - and, therefore, the ideal of culturally constructed masculinity (The Dark Knight, Nolan, 2008)
Hypermasculinity does not just affect the films that Ledger had made, but also the films he would have made. Little known to most, Ledger had directorial ambitions; the first film he wanted to make would have been an adaptation of Walter Tevis’s 1983 novel The Queen’s Gambit. As well as directing, Ledger also intended to star in the film…but he would not have been the lead. The Queen’s Gambit is the story of a young woman trying to make her way in the male-dominated world of chess. In that way, it both reflects the dominant themes in Ledger’s filmography, but yet subverts them. As one of the only women succeeding in chess at the time, Harmon is a pawn of toxic masculinity – a woman very aware of her femaleness in a predominantly male space - but she never lets it pull her under. How aptly this mirrors Ledger’s life! The exact circumstances of his death are murky even to this day; in her article for Wired on Ledger’s post-mortem medical examiner’s report, Kirsten Philipkoski calls the combination of drugs that killed him “unnecessarily dangerous,” and doubts a doctor would prescribe that many of those kinds of medications all at once (1). It is impossible to know how much the roles he had to play took a toll on him. Perhaps Ledger struggled with the very cultural push-and-pull he portrayed so well onscreen….  
Regardless of his career’s impact on his personal life, the imprint Ledger left on the industry is clear. No actor living and working today displays the complications of manhood in quite the same way, nor quite so well.
 
​Works Cited
-- “Brokeback Mountain: A Screenplay.” Proulx, pp. 29-128
Nolan, Jonathan and Nolan, Christopher. “The Dark Knight.” The Dark Knight Trilogy, edited by Christopher Nolan, Jonathan Nolan, and David S. Goyer, OPUS, 2013, pp. 167-323.
Norris, Chris. “(Untitled Heath Ledger Project): Analyzing the Double Life of Heath Ledger” New York Magazine. 18 February 2008 http://nymag.com/news/features/44217/ Accessed 7 March 2017.
Philipkoski, Kristen. “Unnecessarily Dangerous Drug Combo Caused Heath Ledger’s Death.” Wired. 6 February 2008. https://www.wired.com/2008/02/accidental-over/ Accessed 3 March 2017.
Proulx, Annie, McMurtry, Larry, and Ossana, Diana, editors. Brokeback Mountain: Story to Screenplay. Scribner, 2005.
-- “Getting Movied,” McMurtry and Ossana, pp. 129-138 
0 Comments

In "The Lobster," Love is Neither Patient Nor Kind

3/7/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
David (Colin Farrell, far left) and the other Hotel guests on the bus to go hunting (Lanthimos, 2016). 
Picture
by Megan Hess

We live in a world that encourages romantic and marital partnerships. Our entertainment media usually has romantic subplots, and books and movies focused solely on romance typically do very well. Married couples get legal, economic, and social rewards that couples who are only dating or living together do not. These and other factors contribute to the societal idea that people’s lives are better when they are in a monogamous relationship than seeing several people at once, or not seeing anyone at all. But, what if, instead of just implying that being romantically attached was superior, society directly discouraged singleness -  if it offered up an ultimatum: find a mate in a prescribed amount of time, or lose your humanity?
The Lobster (Lanthimos, 2016) operates on this spellbinding premise. Divorced or otherwise single people get shipped off to an upscale hotel designed for the purpose of obtaining a life partner. Once there, they have 45 days to find a compatible mate. If they do not accomplish this objective within the 45-day period, they will be turned into an animal of their choosing. Such a zany, captivating, premise could crumble if mishandled, but, as interpreted by Lanthimos and his team, it’s successful - an unflinching, dark-humored, cynical social commentary on romance and companionship. 
​An innovative plot can only get a filmmaker so far. The Lobster persists beyond attention-grabbing summary because of its relatability. No matter how far it ventures into the bizarre, it remains true to life. The Lobster creates this effect from the beginning in myriad ways. Casting choice is a significant one. The main players are fringe names – actors who have been working in the industry a long time, but do not have the household presence or star power as, for example, Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt do in America. Casting big names in a picture is usually a good marketing strategy, but it is not always the best artistic choice. In fact, it can often work against a director’s favor because the audience is unable to detach the stars from their previous roles. The Lobster does not have that problem. It has a wealth of great character parts, and the actors in those roles are well-suited to them. 

Picture
Rachel Weitz, as the Short-Sighted Woman, delivers a standout performance (The Lobster, Lanthimos, 2016)
As well as avoiding Hollywood elites, The Lobster steps away from Hollywood body types…for the male characters, at least. All of the film’s major female characters except The Biscuit Woman (Ashley Jensen) are classically beautiful. I found this not only unrealistic, but at odds with the rest of the movie. The Lobster is not a film that celebrates beauty. Conversely, The Lobster wraps itself in bleak pessimism, with a scrim of discomfort. Happiness and love do not come easily. For some, they do not come at all. The Lobster does not fit all people’s definition of an enjoyable cinematic experience, but it is an important one – director\screenwriter Yorgos Lanthimos’ first film in English. I believe it was significant that Lanthimos chose not to make this film in his native language, Greek. The Lobster distinctly reflects American values and way of being. Lanthimos’ distance from American society allows him to see it with clearer eyes than an American director who’s enmeshed in the various cogs and gears might. He has created a rich, dark, unforgettable satire.
Picture
David dances with the Nosebleed Woman (Jessica Barden), one of his potential matches (The Lobster, Lanthimos, 2016)
Part of what makes The Lobster so memorable is all it leaves unknown. Unlike other dystopian dramas - both far-removed and recent -  it does not provide exposition for why society picked up this practice. The process of turning humans into animals is never explained, either. The most irritating mystery is the specific details of David’s (Colin Farrell) revenge on a woman who has wronged him – second, of course, to its ending - which Entertainment Weekly calls “beautiful” and “elliptical” – (McGovern 1). The ending of the Lobster is reminiscent of a staple of high school English programs: Frank R. Stockton’s “The Lady or the Tiger?” – not in content but in its potential to provoke bewilderment in the viewer. As such, I would recommend not watching The Lobster unless you have a good half-hour or more to devote to developing your opinion of what happens after the final shot. For every argument, a potential counterpart emerges – but it’s a debate you won’t regret having, whether alone or with friends.
As highly as I praise The Lobster, I admit it might not be the best film for everyone. If you're a soft-hearted, easily nauseated, animal-loving, blockbuster fan, you might want to pass this one by. However, for those who choose to watch, it will be one of the best films you have ever had the chance to enjoy. The Lobster puts Lanthimos in the same class as Asghar Farhadi - a foreign director with crossover appeal, a talent too good to be hoarded by his home country. His next film, The Killing of a Sacred Deer, comes out next year. Will it be as good as The Lobster? It's too soon to tell, but there's a good chance....

Works Cited
McGovern, Joe.  “The Lobster: Colin Farrell shares his (spoiler-free) thoughts on the film’s ending.” Entertainment Weekly. 16 June 2016. http://ew.com/article/2016/06/06/colin-farrell-lobster-ending/  Accessed 26 February 2017. 
0 Comments

Why We Want Fictional Characters to Get Hitched

3/2/2017

0 Comments

 
By Perri Chastulik
Picture
Love-doctor Albert "Hitch" Hitchins helps his protege Albert Brenneman win Allegra Cole. In the process, he learns about love and himself in Hitch, a film which serves as a representation of human relationships and the phenomenon of "shipping."

    From conventions to fanfiction, fans of any TV, movie, or book series can engage in activities “outsiders” may find puzzling. One such practice is “shipping,” or wanting two characters who are not romantically involved (or sometimes not even from the same universe) to get together (Kircher, 2017). As Abby Norman’s enlightening article from The Mary Sue points out, analyzing forums like Tumblr proves even fans ask themselves if shipping makes them “weird” (Norman, 2015). However, there are psychological reasons for the phenomenon, which the 2013 film Hitch (Tennant, 2005) explores.    
    Some films, another example of which is
The Wedding Planner (Shankman, 2001) center on shippers of sorts whose job it is to bring characters together. Hitch has a love-doctor protagonist who works to help awkward men like Albert Brennaman’s dates go well. Alex “Hitch” Hitchens’ heart was broken at a young age, and he pities guys who are never given a chance because more confident men get in the way or cold women refuse to look at them. He explains this when defending the merits of his job to his skeptical love interest Sarah, as shown below.

    Hitch's brand of empathy, Norman argues, is essential to the human ability to connect with and therefore ship fictional characters (Norman, 2015). She also distinguishes between belief and alief. The latter relates to fictional characters and is less developed in children, which is why they have to be constantly reminded actors are “only pretending” (Norman, 2015). However, even adults suspend their disbelief and let themselves connect with characters, wanting them to find the right person.
    Raman Passion offers an even simpler reason for shipping in his article for Penn State called Why Do We Ship?. At the basic level, people love love (Passion)! Although romantic comedies like Hitch are in a bit of a downturn as far as success lately, they are still a viable genre, and love works its way into nearly every story. As Passion states, people have a basic social need to be with one another and a biological need to continue the species, so they appreciate romantic stories and create their own (Passion, 2017).    
    Romantic buildup and subtext are two of the main elements of what make a couple “ship-worthy.” Hitch has both of these in spades. It made the wise choice to focus on Hitch the love-doctor’s attempts to help Albert win Allegra Cole, the girl of his dreams. In the process, Hitch also meets and woos Sarah Melas despite her original misgivings. The film shows the progress of these two relationships, and viewers “ship” them all the way to the end. Some may even ship Albert and Hitch’s “bromance” (a term for an endearing and nearly romantic friendship between two males) into a full relationship based on its growth.    
    Besides being an entertaining watch, Hitch is like a case study into how people relate to fictional characters and each other. A love-doctor is a fitting metaphor for a shipper. Other, more popular films may have a more rabid fan base and more loyal devotion to particular couplings. Still, the phenomenon of shipping itself is at the base level biological, and, at the story level,  a sign that character relationships are well-developed.
Works Cited
  1. Hitch. Dir. Andy Tennant. Sony Pictures, Feb. 11, 2005. TV.
  2. Kircher, Madison M. “'I ship them' — the strange concept that's changing the way people talk about relationships.” Business Insider, 3 Aug. 2015. Web. Feb. 2017.
  3. Norman, Abby. “The Psychology of Fandom: Why We Get Attached to Fictional Characters.” themarysue.com, 19 Aug. 2015. Web. Feb. 2017.
  4. Passion, Raman. “Why Do We Ship?” Penn State University, n.d. Web. Feb. 2017. 
0 Comments

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    July 2013
    June 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.