Cinemablography@gmail.com
Cinemablography
  • Home
  • About
  • Journal
    • Existentialism in Film >
      • The Existential Philosophy of Melancholia
      • The Philosophy of Camus in The Dead Don't Die
      • The Existentialist Subtext of Dear Evan Hansen
      • An Existentialist Reading of "The Turin Horse"
    • A Woman's Perspective: Gender, and Identity in the Romanian New Wave
    • Film Theory Issue 1
    • Film Theory Issue 2
    • Science Fiction
    • Science Fiction Issue 2
    • Pan's Labyrinth
    • Kathryn Bigelow >
      • Opening Scene
      • Supermarket Scene
      • Round Table Discussion
  • Blog
  • Articles by Category
  • Contributors
  • Videographic Essays
  • Our Work
    • Links

IT Review: The Rebirth of Mainstream Horror

9/29/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Jack Waterman

Speaking as someone who isn’t really a coulrophobe, I could never really grasp what it is about clowns that freaks people out so much. Sure, it can be kind of awkward interacting with them, but I tended to view them more as eccentric weirdos than aberrant monstrosities. But having recently seen the 2017 theatrical rendition of Stephen King’s bestselling novel, IT, I believe I have finally discovered why clowns are so feared. And that someone apparently remembers New Kids on the Block.

IT (2017) is directed by Argentinian filmmaker Andy Muschietti, who some might recognize as the director of both the short and feature length versions of Mamá (2008 and 2013, respectively). The film centers around a group of middle school students, known as “The Losers Club”, who are being tormented incessantly by both bullies and their own parents. As if things couldn’t get any worse, they also find themselves being stalked by a morphing, demonic entity known as Pennywise the Dancing Clown, otherwise referred to as “IT”.
Picture
The Losers Club, preparing to fight Pennywise.
First and foremost, go see this movie. Now. As of the time of writing, IT is still in theaters and has managed to overtake The Exorcist as the highest grossing horror movie ever. IT’s a very good movie. One of this year’s best, in fact. I am aware that there are a lot of people who don’t particularly care for scary movies. And make no mistake, this movie is certainly scary. As previously mentioned, this movie singlehandedly managed to make me afraid of clowns for the first time in my life. Just the way Pennywise looks, with his glowing eyes and his unnaturally proportioned face, was enough to have me looking over my shoulder for about a day after seeing IT. Possibly owing to the stellar makeup and special effects, I felt intimidated by this clown in ways that I really hadn’t with other depictions of “scary” clowns.

Despite this, I would absolutely recommend that the timid among us go see the movie anyway. Why? Because the actors are just too darn fantastic to ignore. Indeed, what truly makes this movie great are not IT’s sequences of nail-biting terror, but the hilarious and endearing characters. Anybody can relate to at least one of the members of the Losers Club, and I found myself rooting for the team every step of the way. The persistent volley of expletives rushing out of the kids’ mouths never failed to make me chuckle, and their steadfast devotion to each other warmed the heart of this dour horror fan. All of the child actors (and most of the adult actors) do a fantastic job with their roles, and I can’t wait to see what projects they’ll end up in next. In a sense, IT is a horror movie for people who don’t like horror movies.

Picture
Pennywise the Dancing Clown.
A big question that’s been asked is whether IT is faithful to the source material. I confess that I have only read a handful of Stephen King’s short stories, so I wouldn’t really consider myself to be the arbiter of all things King. I do think, however, I have a good enough understanding of his writing to determine why films based of off his sordid tales tend to have a spotty reputation. His books can be incredibly dense and full of minute details that don’t always translate well to film. IT is based on a book that is 1,100+ pages, so it obviously wouldn’t be practical to attempt a word for word adaptation. I have it on good authority that IT successfully captures the spirit of the book while picking out the unnecessary bits, distilling the experience down to a comfortable two hours. The only real contention I have with IT is the somewhat sloppy pacing of the third act. The film seems to peak early at the end of the second act, and it takes a significant amount of time to bring the tension back up to this level for the third act. But to be honest, I loved the characters so much that I didn’t even care that much. I was merely happy that I could spend more time with them.

But the most important aspect of IT is probably the monumental effect the movie has had on the horror community. For the first time in years, a horror film has come out that is loved by audiences, hailed by critics, and financially successful. All of a sudden, horror has become (or is at least becoming) mainstream again, and there are already more scary flicks on the horizon. Not to mention, IT raised the box office out of the slump it was in. And if that wasn’t enough, Muschietti is also directing a sequel to the first movie, and I can’t wait to see IT (chapter 2).

0 Comments

Walt Disney Animation, Unfrozen and Untangled: The Beginning of the "Modern Era" of Disney Animation

9/25/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
Picture
By Emmanuel Gundran

​Although Disney has been well known for its partnership with Pixar to create computer-generated, animated films, they have also recently revitalized their feature animation branch that has been the source of many classic and new films. In 2006, when Disney purchased Pixar, there was fear within the Walt Disney Animation branch that the company would drop their classic animation branch in favor of Pixar. This was not helped by the studio’s layoffs and failed projects such as Chicken Little (Dindal 2005) and Home on the Range (Finn and Sanford 2004). (Barnes 2014) However, Bob Iger, CEO of Disney, allowed John Lasseter and Edwin E. Camull of Pixar to revitalize the branch and out came movies that would bring it back into the limelight.
Picture
Chicken Little is an adaptation of the classic fable of the same name.
One of the first films that started what Walt Disney Studios calls the “Present Era” of Disney Animation from 2009 to today was Princess and the Frog (Clements and Musker 2009), Disney’s first hand-drawn animated film in five years since Home on the Range. The film is a retelling of the classic fairytale of The Frog Prince set in 1950’s Louisiana. A nineteen-year old girl named Tiana (Anika Noni Rose) works day and night as a waitress at two diners in New Orleans to pursue her dream of opening her own restaurant. She eventually crosses paths with Prince Naveen (Bruno Campos) from a kingdom across the sea who is turned into a frog after making a deal with a voodoo doctor named Dr. Facilier (Keith David). When Tiana, believing in the fairy tale about the frog prince, kisses the the prince-turned-frog Naveen, she too is turned into a frog. Now, the two must find a way to break the curse.
Picture
Tiana is praised as an inspirational character for people regardless of their race and age.
​Even though the film only made over $786 thousand on opening weekend and didn’t make enough to support its estimated $105 million budget, the film was received very well by critics and made history as starring the first African-American Disney princess. Tom Huddleston of TimeOut admired it for daring to recreate the animation style of Disney’s earlier films from the 90’s and succeeding (“The Princess and the Frog”). Candice Frederick of Reel Talk Online praised it for inspiring audiences no matter their age or color to pursue their dreams (“The Princess and the Frog”). Although the film does not directly touch on the issue of race, it is seemingly implied with Tiana, an African-American woman who works to get what she wants, and her best friend Charlotte, a White noblewoman who is privileged to have anything that she wants. As Manohla Dargis of The New York Times points out, putting these two characters together will inevitably create parallels to the conflict of race and class in the real world. (“That Old Bayou Magic…”) However, for the sake of not risking losing money, the film does not engage the issue directly. Nevertheless, this subtle social commentary would show up in later Disney animated films.
While other Disney-animated films that premiered after Princess and the Frog such as Tangled (Greno and Howard, 2010) and Wreck-it Ralph (Moore, 2012) had as much, if not more, success with critics and the box office, it was Frozen (Buck and Lee, 2013) that became a cultural phenomenon and put Disney Animation on the map once again. It follows the story of Elsa (Idina Menzel) who runs away from her kingdom to create an ice palace in the mountains to hide her ice powers from the world. However, her sister Anna (Kristen Bell) will go the distance to find her and bring her back home. The film made over $1 billion worldwide, won two Oscars at the Academy Awards, launched a short film, a sequel, a Broadway musical, and countless pieces of merchandise. The film’s most iconic song “Let it Go” has over 1.1 billion views on Disney UK’s YouTube channel.
Picture
Frozen is easily one of Disney's most popular and successful films of recent history, and Let it Go is one of their most popular songs.
How did this Frozen frenzy happen? For one, there is the hero’s journey story structure that people can easily latch onto. Lucinda Everett of The Guardian cites a six-year old that she talked to, who told her that the film has the familiar story structure of characters you know and love who solve a problem and have a happy ending (“Why is Frozen so popular?…”). Another reason here is that the film came at just the right time for its audiences. By 2013, social media had been a major part of the younger generations’ lives. The film’s praises were sung all across YouTube with users’ covers of “Let it Go”, and friends and family could share their enjoyable experiences watching the film and encourage others to watch it as well. Third, despite the familiarity of its story structure, Frozen also happens to subvert many of the tropes that are commonly associated with classic Disney movies. For one, there are two princesses in the film rather than one. One princess, Anna, is the hero of the story who travels the country to find the other princess, Elsa, her sister. The film even goes as far to subvert the typical romantic tropes of Disney princess films. The male lead, Kristoff (Jonathan Groff), who follows Anna on her journey is a rugged loner who finds that even reindeer are better than people. Though he eventually becomes Anna’s love interest, it does not happen without conflict. Meanwhile, Elsa becomes a Disney princess whose personal arc does not end with her falling in love with a man. Perhaps this style of subverting tropes and providing social commentary would inform later Disney Animation features such as Zootopia (Howard and Moore, 2016), which deals with racism and classism using anthropomorphic animals, and Moana (Clements, Musker, et. al, 2016), which continues Princess and the Frog’s tradition of creating a strong, female lead and focusing on the culture of ethnic minorities.
Picture
Moana carries on the modern Disney tradition of creating strong female protagonists.
​Walt Disney Animation is here to stay, and hopefully bring more films that offer great stories, characters, and even some insightful commentary.

​Sources Cited:


Dargis, Manohla. “That Old Bayou Magic: Kiss and Ribbit (and Sing).” The New York Times, 24 Nov. 2009. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/25/movies/25frog.html?mcubz=0.

Everett, Lucinda. “Why is Frozen so popular? You asked Google - here’s the answer.” The Guardian, 20 Dec. 2016. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/dec/20/google-autocomplete-why-frozen-film-so-popular.

Frederick, Candice. “The Princess and the Frog.” Reel Talk Online, 19 Dec. 2009. http://www.reeltalkonline.org/2009/12/princess-and-frog.html.​

Huddleston, Tom. “The Princess and the Frog. TimeOut, 26 Jan. 2010. https://www.timeout.com/london/film/the-princess-and-the-frog.
0 Comments

Coming Home to a New Beginning: A Review of Spider-Man Homecoming

9/22/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
Picture
By Emmanuel Gundran
Spider-Man Homecoming (Watts, 2017), a refreshing take on the ongoing superhero genre, proves itself to be a unique entry in the long-running Spider-Man film franchise. The film follows the story of Peter Parker (Tom Holland), a high school student in New York City who works as a superhero between keeping up his academic obligations and keeping his hero identity a secret. When criminals like the Shocker (Logan Marshall-Green) and the Vulture (Michael Keaton) arise, Peter has to spring into action. However, being inexperienced as a superhero comes at a price, as he unintentionally causes large amounts of property damage and risk for civilians along the way. During his career as a hero, Peter must learn the importance of power and responsibility.
The film’s overarching theme of Peter learning from his mistakes as a superhero make this film stand out from the other Marvel films with heroes who are more experienced. Throughout the film, Peter, as Spider-Man, makes mistakes while going about his duty. When he tries to shoot webs and swing around a small town, he realizes that he cannot swing from a tree and plummets into some young girls’ camping tent in their backyard. There’s another moment in which Spider-Man tries to use advanced web technology that was built into his suit, but he fails and falls on his face. Eventually, Peter meddles with the technology in the suit so much that he has his suit taken away by his mentor, Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.), and has to learn responsibility without the majority of his powers.
Picture
Spider-Man struggling to keep the two halves of a freighter together, mirroring his struggle to keep his two lives together.
The cast, from the lead actor to the villain and supporting characters, is comprised of a talented group of both young and old actors. The choice of Tom Holland as the titular character seemed like a natural fit, and it shows through his performance. Holland’s young, energetic personality in real life transfers well to playing this optimistic yet inexperienced version of Spider-Man. It helps that Holland is younger, being twenty-one, so that he could sell the idea that Peter is a newer superhero. Jacob Batalon, who plays Peter’s best friend Ned Leeds, is great as a comedic support character. While the humor of the film can get unexpectedly bawdy, he makes it feel natural for his character. The best cast actor in the film goes to Michael Keaton’s Vulture. As an actor, Keaton brings intensity to any role that he’s given, from Batman, to Dogberry, and Birdman. One particular scene has him interrogating Peter in a car, and it shows just how intense he can be while speaking in a voice no higher than a whisper. However, what makes Michael Keaton one of the best actors in a villainous Marvel role is his ability to play the blue-collar everyman.
Picture
Even outside the menacing Vulture costume, Keaton shines as an intimidating antagonist.
The flaws that the film has are mostly tied to its connection to previous entries in the Spider-Man franchise and to some of the differences it has with the original Spider-Man comics. The death of Peter’s Uncle Ben is a major plot point in other films such as Spider-Man (Raimi, 2001) and The Amazing Spider-Man (Webb, 2012) and the event is considered a major moment in Peter’s life, as it motivates him to become a hero. Meanwhile, Uncle Ben is not given as much as a single reference by name in Homecoming. This makes Peter’s personal motivation seem shallow, only wanting to help the people of New York City because it is just the right thing to do and not because of some personal compulsion. While Captain America: Civil War (Russo & Russo, 2016) explored some of this version of Peter Parker’s motives, this film did not develop them as much as it could have.
With this said, Spider-Man Homecoming, despite being bogged down as the sixth in a series of Spider-Man films, makes itself a fresh new take on a classic superhero.
0 Comments

"And though she be but little, she is fierce:" the Evolution of the Portrayal of Femininity in Amy Adams' Filmography

9/18/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
Amy Adams as Dr. Louise Banks in Arrival (Villeneuve, 2016)
​
Picture
by Megan Hess
When Arrival (Villeneuve, 2016) came to theaters, it stood apart from other science-fiction films released that year because of its intellectual focus and nonviolence, but also because of Amy Adams’ world-class performance as linguistics professor Dr. Louise Banks, Arrival’s protagonist. Adams’ character is unlike many popular sci-fi heroines – bold women brandishing weapons and breaking down doors. Manohla Dargis describes her as “thoughtful, serious, at ease with her own silence and fears” (1). Banks’ reticence distinguishes her from her predecessors. Ellen Ripley and Sarah Connors have fears, but they lack her grace and quiet strength, just as she does not possess their flinty confidence and brashness.
Louise Banks is an ideal part  – nuanced, powerful, not a sexual object. Yet, it can be challenging for a young, conventionally attractive actress to get such roles. Inexperience is usually the main reason for a younger actress losing a role to someone older; rarely is an industry newcomer more talented than someone who has been honing their craft for a decade or more. Presentation is another factor. Actresses known for being “sexy” often have a hard time casting that reputation aside. (In Amy Adams’ case, that was never part of her personal brand, making the transition out of meat-market roles easier for her.) On top of that, often, the “better” parts are treated as consolation prizes for women who have passed from the ingenue stage to the status of a “mature” woman. Young actresses get roles which put their youth and physical beauty on display, while “older” women, whose aging bodies are not considered as sexually desirable by the culture at large, get the Oscar-buzz characters. Now in her 40s’, Adams qualifies by Hollywood standards.
Adams is not the first actress to experience this phenomenon. Julia Roberts’ career is a prime example. Her roles in Mystic Pizza (Petrie, 1988), Pretty Woman (Marshall, 1990), Notting Hill (Michell, 1999) and Runaway Bride (Marshall, 1999) are all very typical for a beginning actress. Erin Brockovich (Soderbergh, 2000) started to reveal Roberts’ potential beyond the cutesy romantic lead with a big smile. Now she has a varied resume. 
Picture
Julia Roberts in Mystic Pizza  (Petrie, 1988), above and Eat, Pray, Love (Murphy, 2010), below
Picture
​Drew Barrymore’s early filmography also follows this pattern – looking specifically at Ever After: A Cinderella Story (Tennant, 1998) Never Been Kissed (Gosnell, 1999), both Charlie’s Angels (McG, 2000) and Charlie’s Angels: Full Throttle (McG, 2003), 50 First Dates (Segal, 2004), Music and Lyrics (Lawrence, 2007), and even Donnie Darko (Kelly, 2001). Barrymore is also an exception to the rule because she has pulled back from screen acting in recent years and focused more on voice acting and producing. Meg Ryan is another exception. She never got to complete the cycle, and is remembered for her rom-com child-women, even if she has surpassed the bubbly romantic lead in her acting (but some would argue she did that to herself by removing herself from the game.) Julie Miller’s Vanity Fair interview with the actress explores this, citing a previous interview Ryan gave to InStyle magazine where she said the following: “I understood it was a compliment about being lovable…. But it also felt like ideas were being projected onto me that had nothing to do with me. The girl next door to what?” (1). 
Picture
Drew Barrymore as Danielle, the protagonist of Ever After (Tennant, 1998)
Picture
Meg Ryan, When Harry Met Sally (Reiner, 1989)
​This problem still affects the current generation of starlets. Margot Robbie stands out as a prime example. A string of sex object roles make up her career –  Naomi Lapaglia, Jordan Belfont’s (Leonardo DiCaprio) mistress\wife in The Wolf of Wall Street (Scorsese, 2013), Jess Barrett, Nicky Spurgeon’s (Will Smith) lover\business partner in Focus (Fircarra and Requa, 2015), and Harley Quinn in Suicide Squad (Ayer, 2016) to list a few of the most notable. Jennifer Lawrence embodies a reverse trajectory of the trend, going from more empowered, androgynous characters to more passive, traditionally feminine ones.  Her roles in Winter’s Bone (Granik, 2010) and Silver Linings Playbook (Russell, 2012) – the source of her first Oscar -  starkly contrast her part in another David O. Russell movie: Joy (2015). In Passengers (Tyldum, 2016), she got more press for her character’s intimate moments with Chris Pratt’s character than her actual acting. These examples prove that this is not an individual problem, but an industry trend. 
Picture
Margot Robbie in The Wolf of Wall Street (Scorsese, 2013) and Suicide Squad (Ayer, 2016) [below] playing different iterations of the same character archetype
Picture
​Let’s return to Amy Adam’s filmography, starting with the beauty pageant mockumentary Drop Dead Gorgeous (Jann, 1999) where Adams plays Lesley Miller, a “dopey cheerleader who shows more skin than sense” (Pulchko 1). Adams carried the legacy of Leslie Miller with her into the 2000s’ when making Enchanted (Lima, 2007), one of Disney’s most popular live-action movies. Adams’ performance drives its success; she embodies the frothy innocence that characterizes most classic Disney princesses. Delysia Lafosse, her character in Miss Pettigrew Lives for a Day (Nalluri, 2008) has similar characteristics, but serves as a turning point because she reveals a bit of depth – the flaws under the fluff. Intentional or not, the bulk of Adams’ roles since (excepting Leap Year (Tucker, 2010)) draw on that seriousness. Now, she picks up characters who are subdued and vulnerable, but not fragile: women who are feminine, but not girly. Sister James, her character in Doubt (Shanley, 2008) is an ideal example. For those who have not seen the film, Adams plays a young nun working in a Catholic school under the unyielding and cynical Sister Aloysius (Meryl Streep). She gets drawn into a conflict between Sister Aloysius and Father Flynn, the parish priest (Philip Seymour Hoffman) and is forced to take sides when neither party has clear evidence against the other. Her character is warm, but guarded, obedient but not subservient, quiet and respectful, but not passive. 
Picture
Meryl Streep (left) and Adams (right) in Doubt (Shanley, 2008)
Louise Banks from Arrival is much the same. As Dargis praises Adams’ performance, she spotlights those qualities, saying: “By turns inviting and opaque, Ms. Adams turns softness and quiet into heroic qualities, keeping her voice low and modulated, and using stillness to draw you near” (1). While Hollywood depictions of motherhood are often limiting and bizarre, Adams’ Louise Banks feels genuinely maternal. How apt that she’s a linguist – that it takes a “soft science” to save the world. When Denis Villeneuve called Adams “the soul of Arrival” (Rich 1) he spoke accurately. As Louise Banks, she carries the picture with a casual elegance never seen in her early roles, but that frequently features in her later ones.
Amy Adams’ gradual shift in roles is interesting to study just from the standpoint of tracking her career, but it is also important on a systemic level. So many of the well-loved films for women – Adams’ and others – feature and reward a “typical” portrayal of femininity: bubbly, middle\upper-class, pretty, and white. This latter half of Adams’ career praises the subtleties of femininity without holding women – especially older women – to an unrealistic standard. It’s good for women to be loud and sexy and messy onscreen, in the vein of a Jennifer Lawrence or a Melissa McCarthy, but not all women are capable of all of that all the time. With her recent contributions to film, Adams affirms a more contemplative femininity, one rich with the complexities of being female in multiple times and places.
Works Cited
Dargis, Manohla. “Review: Aliens Drop Anchor in ‘Arrival,’ but What are Their Intentions?” The New York Times  https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/11/movies/arrival-review-amy-adams-jeremy-renner.html?referrer=google_kp Accessed 4 April 2017
Miller, Julie “Meg Ryan is Moving Past Her Movie Star Days, And You Should, Too” Vanity Fair  http://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2016/09/meg-ryan-ithaca-interview  Accessed 4 April 2017
Pulchko, Kristy. “Amy Adams Reveals The Link Between American Hustle and Drop Dead Gorgeous” http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Amy-Adams-Reveals-Link-Between-American-Hustle-Drop-Dead-Gorgeous-40764.html  Accessed 4 April 2017
Rich, Katey. “Why Amy Adams’ Oscar Snub Was So Surprising” Vanity Fair https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2017/01/amy-adams-arrival-oscars Accessed 14 September 2017
0 Comments

Netflix Film Gets Down "To The Bone" of Eating Disorders

9/8/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
​Ellen (Lily Collins, right) and her step-sister Kelly (Liana Liberato, left) talk after an unsuccessful family therapy session (To the Bone, Noxon, 2017).
Picture
by Megan Hess
​Although eating disorders affect millions of people’s lives every year, it is not an experience that is well-represented in film – both in that said films often have inaccuracies or oversimplified portrayals of a complex problem, or just that not very many popular ones exist. In all fairness, making a film about a protagonist with an eating disorder is tricky business. While many people first think of the external, physical component of eating disorders first, they are also largely mental and internal. The warped sense of reality, constant loop of negative self-talk and other thought\behavior patterns characteristic of eating disorders can be more challenging to present on screen in a fresh and authentic way. Another challenge – for films about anorexia more than any other - is the need to balance realism and the actor’s health. Eating disorder films often do the opposite of what they intend by creating “thinspiration” images sufferers use as weight-loss goals. For example, in Wasted: A Memoir of Anorexia and Bulimia, Mayra Hornbacher talks about how the TV movie version of Steven Levenkron’s The Best Little Girl in the World “is often shown on eating-disorder units and never fails to bring a great many patients into a tizzy over how skinny the actress (who starved herself to play the part) is and how they need to be as thin as her” (Hornbacher 43). 
Picture
Picture
Jennifer Jason Leigh in The Best Little Girl in the World (O'Steen, 1981)
​Although I have enjoyed reading both real and fictionalized accounts of eating disorders for many years, To the Bone (Noxon, 2017) was the first eating disorder movie I have ever watched. Like any other form of movie, when done well, they can be powerful. To the Bone follows Ellen (Lily Collins), a 20-year-old with anorexia who goes on a transformative journey by way of a group home with “unconventional” methods. Lily Collins has a sad Basset hound face that goes well with her character’s sense of guilt for her indirect role in a haunting tragedy, which drives her self-hatred. The movie provides broad sweeps of backstory that can be pieced together as factors for her disease, but does not go into her past – or any of the other characters’ - very much. Possibly, that strategy was the creators’ way to avoid creating a “cause-and-effect” narrative – one of the ways To the Bone shows the complexity of the eating disordered experience. Instead of just a house full of young white women – aka, what many people picture when they think of people with eating disorders – the fictional group home in To The Bone has a pregnant bulimic, a black lesbian binge eater, and a male anorexic among the residents. 
Picture
Luke (Alex Sharp) and Ellen (Lily Collins) chat (To the Bone, Noxon, 2017)
I thought Luke, the male anorexic character, was an important inclusion, since men now make up 25% of the eating disordered population, according to the National Eating Disorders Association. However, To the Bone made him too much of a focus when they could have been investing screen time into building the relationships between the women in the house. Furthermore, while Alex Sharp - a rising-star Brit known for being the youngest person ever to win the Tony Award for Best Actor in A Play – does an excellent job with his role (I consider his rain dance one of the highlights of To the Bone), the movie smothers the viewer with his character, and there’s an unforgivable twist with his and Ellen’s character arcs. In all, it could use less of Luke and more of Dr. Beckham (Keanu Reeves, who outperforms everyone else in the film). The ending does not provide much closure, but does offer a lot of hope. While I would not recommend it as a first resource to people without much prior knowledge of eating disorders, To the Bone is still an interesting film with strong moments and characters, for all its flaws.
Works Cited
Hornbacher, Marya. Wasted: A Memoir of Anorexia and Bulimia. New York: HarperCollins, 1998. Print. 
0 Comments

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    February 2023
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    July 2013
    June 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.