Cinemablography@gmail.com
Cinemablography
  • Home
  • About
  • Journal
    • Existentialism in Film >
      • The Existential Philosophy of Melancholia
      • The Philosophy of Camus in The Dead Don't Die
      • The Existentialist Subtext of Dear Evan Hansen
      • An Existentialist Reading of "The Turin Horse"
    • A Woman's Perspective: Gender, and Identity in the Romanian New Wave
    • Film Theory Issue 1
    • Film Theory Issue 2
    • Science Fiction
    • Science Fiction Issue 2
    • Pan's Labyrinth
    • Kathryn Bigelow >
      • Opening Scene
      • Supermarket Scene
      • Round Table Discussion
  • Blog
  • Articles by Category
  • Contributors
  • Videographic Essays
  • Our Work
    • Links

The Documentary Genre: Recording Reality

3/11/2014

1 Comment

 
Picture
Image from Nanook of the North (Flaherty, 1922)
by Michael Hoffman
            Generally speaking, documentaries are nonfictional films that attempt to portray some aspect of reality, largely for the purposes of instruction or persuasion. With this definition in mind, just like the comedy genre, the documentary genre’s roots can be seen extending back to the establishment of film as a viable storytelling medium, since the earliest films were single-shot moments of ordinary events. However, given the shorter nature of these early films, various commentators have found it more appropriate to label them as precursors to the documentary genre, so often these films are referred to as “actuality” films (“Documentary Film History”). Typically, the film that is often credited as the first true documentary piece is Robert Flaherty’s Nanook of the North (1922). With this film, Flaherty embraced the notion of creatively interpreting reality by staging certain scenes in a manner that adequately conveyed his message.

            Given the effectiveness of the documentary genre to persuade its viewers through the presentation of “reality,” documentaries were heavily exploited for propagandist means around the dawn of World War II (and have been used for propaganda in many wars since then). Some of the more notorious propaganda documentaries of the time included Leni Riefenstahl’s Triumph of the Will (1935) and Frank Capra’s Why We Fight series (1942-45). However, with the 1950s and 1960s, documentaries began to embrace the styles of “cinema truth” and direct cinema, which were movements that aimed to present social and political issues in a direct, unmediated way. In essence, these movements came about as a reaction against studio-based film production constraints, and preferred to shot on location with smaller crews and handheld cameras (“Documentary Film History”). Moreover, both styles opted for longer camera takes on people to capture more personal reactions, and shied away from any form of sit-down interview. Basically, the belief was that through the capturing of an enormous amount of undirected and natural footage, editors could sculpt the material into a truly authentic story. Nevertheless, as the previous sentence indicates, films that sought to embrace this movement typically gave off a false notion of reality, since the filmmaker was still in full control during the editing process.

            Since the heyday of “cinema truth” and direct cinema, the documentary has continued to evolve and experience tremendous success. With landmark films like The Thin Blue Line (Morris, 1988), which incorporated highly stylized re-enactments of key moments in the story, and Roger and Me (Moore, 1989), which placed far more interpretive control in the hands of the director, the documentary genre demonstrated its potential for flexibility and innovation. In addition, since documentaries typically have far lower budgets than dramatic narrative films, they tend to be rather attractive to film companies who know that documentaries can be highly profitable even as a limited theatrical release due to the genre’s relative popularity. Moreover, since documentaries tend to have lower budgets and digital cameras have become more affordable, the genre offers a very feasible route for new filmmakers to pursue. In summation, while the documentary genre has been around since the dawn of film, its continued evolution and potential for growth makes it a very exciting genre for the future of filmmaking.

Works Cited

"Documentary Film History." Documentary Archive. <http://documentaryarchive.com/documentary_history.html>.
1 Comment
Jean & Jack Hoffman
3/11/2014 10:24:54 am

Good writing--concise, informative. interesting!

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    July 2013
    June 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.