Cinemablography@gmail.com
Cinemablography
  • Home
  • About
  • Journal
    • Existentialism in Film >
      • The Existential Philosophy of Melancholia
      • The Philosophy of Camus in The Dead Don't Die
      • The Existentialist Subtext of Dear Evan Hansen
      • An Existentialist Reading of "The Turin Horse"
    • A Woman's Perspective: Gender, and Identity in the Romanian New Wave
    • Film Theory Issue 1
    • Film Theory Issue 2
    • Science Fiction
    • Science Fiction Issue 2
    • Pan's Labyrinth
    • Kathryn Bigelow >
      • Opening Scene
      • Supermarket Scene
      • Round Table Discussion
  • Blog
  • Articles by Category
  • Contributors
  • Videographic Essays
  • Our Work
    • Links

Film Vs. Digital: Looking to the Future

10/4/2016

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Brandon Gordon
Picture
​          One of the greatest transitions in film has occurred within the last twenty years, and it happened with very few people noticing. Almost all multiplex movie theaters use some form of digital projection system and have for several years now. Gone are the years of celluloid film being screen for a wide audience. At the turn of the century many film productions began the transition to digital cameras over film. This meant hard drives and memory cards instead of film canisters needing development. About twenty years ago filmmakers realized the usefulness of filming using digital cameras. There was no longer a need to buy and carry film that would only see one use. Instead, a card that could be cleared and used over and over again took its place. This was the birth of the digital age in film.
            There are always bumps in the beginning, for anything. This was certainly the case for film. There was much trial and error before filmmakers became comfortable using the new digital technology to their advantage. It wasn’t until the string of success with low budget features hitting it big at the box office when many production companies realized they could cut costs while retaining the same quality from film. There were, however, some who disagreed. Filmmakers like Christopher Nolan, Quentin Tarantino and Terrance Malick pushed back against switching to digital. Shooting on film can offer something for directors and cinematographers that digital do not. Either it’s a cleaner image or crisper colors, but many argue that there is a discipline that comes with film, one they prefer to have over working with digital cameras. That discipline is the care and caution that comes from using film. Making sure the exposure on the film is perfect because you only get one chance is a fantastic motivator to give each shot your best effort.  That does not mean film has an advantage over digital. Many cinematographers still prefer to shoot digitally due to the security and sensibility of doing so. As long as you have a battery and a memory card you can film on a digital camera. Then it is simple to transfer your files charge your batteries and be ready for another day on set. Digital can be an effective choice and in the early 2000’s many young filmmakers made it theirs. It started with indie and horror films. The Blair Witch Project (Myrick, Sanchez, 1999) was the first digital film to break box office records when it grossed over $140 million on a budget of less than $65,000. After this, almost every horror film began to shoot on digital cameras, and many more quickly followed. 
Picture
Quentin Tarantino shot Hateful Eight using 65mm Film for projection in Ultra Panavision.
​            This is not to say that there is a clear winner or loser in the Film vs. Digital debate. Both mediums still have their weaknesses and their strengths. In the end what it really comes down to - and has since the beginning - is preference. The preference of the filmmakers as well as the budget they are working with ultimately dictates how they film. It is hard to deny the greatness of digital cameras when also looking at the accessibility to young up and coming filmmakers. Many now get their start shooting films digitally. A whole generation of great filmmakers is being born from the digital revolution.
            There is no winner or looser, one is not better than the other. At the end of the day, though, when you go to the theater to see a movie, more often than not it will be shown on a digital projector. We live in a digital age and the future holds great progress that is still to be made.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    February 2023
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    July 2013
    June 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.