Cinemablography@gmail.com
Cinemablography
  • Home
  • About
  • Journal
    • Existentialism in Film >
      • The Existential Philosophy of Melancholia
      • The Philosophy of Camus in The Dead Don't Die
      • The Existentialist Subtext of Dear Evan Hansen
      • An Existentialist Reading of "The Turin Horse"
    • A Woman's Perspective: Gender, and Identity in the Romanian New Wave
    • Film Theory Issue 1
    • Film Theory Issue 2
    • Science Fiction
    • Science Fiction Issue 2
    • Pan's Labyrinth
    • Kathryn Bigelow >
      • Opening Scene
      • Supermarket Scene
      • Round Table Discussion
  • Blog
  • Articles by Category
  • Contributors
  • Videographic Essays
  • Our Work
    • Links

Film Review: 10 Cloverfield Lane

11/4/2016

0 Comments

 
Picture
Picture
By Megan Hess
​It would not be an exaggeration to say that without Cloverfield (Reeves, 2008), J.J. Abrams would never have Star Wars: The Force Awakens (Abrams, 2015) on his resume. Before Cloverfield, Abrams had a successful TV career (he’s most known for helping to create and write the show Lost) but, once he produced Cloverfield, people began to respect him as a filmmaker.
With 10 Cloverfield Lane (Trachtenberg, 2016), Abrams returns, in a way, to the film that made him famous. Despite its name, 10 Cloverfield Lane does not share many characteristics with the original – partly because it was initially an original script that got co-opted under the Cloverfield name. Whiplash (Chazelle, 2014) wunderkind Damien Chazelle rewrote much of Josh Campbell and Matthew Stuecken’s work and 10 Cloverfield Lane is the better for it. Chazelle first won over the crowds at Sundance with Whiplash, which won three out of its five Oscar nominations; his most recent project, La La Land (Chazelle, 2016) has not come out in theaters yet, but is already the subject of much talk in the film community, and could lead to a first Best Actress nomination for Emma Stone, its leading lady.
Unfortunately for Chazelle, I do not think that 10 Cloverfield Lane will be up for any Academy Awards this year. However, this does not mean that 10 Cloverfield Lane is an unsatisfactory part of Damien Chazelle’s filmography. (In fact, this is good; it means that people who might not choose to watch his more indie efforts can be exposed to Chazelle’s talent).  It stands apart from other recent releases in its genre, not only because of the quality of Chazelle’s writing, but because of the strong performances from its cast. 
Picture
Emmett (John Gallagher Jr., far left) and Michelle (Mary Elizabeth Winstead, center) watch as Howard (John Goodman, right) makes an important decision (10 Cloverfield Lane, Trachtenberg, 2016)
​10 Cloverfield Lane only has three major characters: Michelle (Mary Elizabeth Winstead, playing a soul sister to her Scott Pilgrim vs. the World (Wright, 2010) character Ramona Flowers), Howard (John Goodman, making it impossible to ever watch Monsters Inc. (Docter, Unkrich, & Silverman, 2001) the same way again), and Emmett (John Gallagher, Jr., in a role oddly similar to his Short Term 12 (Crettin, 2013) character, Mason) The plot is equally sparse (at least at first) - Michelle gets into a car wreck and finds herself chained to a water pipe in an underground bunker, kept by a man who insists that the three people living there are all that’s left of the world above. The film’s minimalism is part of its appeal; it allows both the production team and the audience members to dive deep into the characters and keeps the mystery at the forefront. 10 Cloverfield Lane utilizes a slow buildup to an extremely emotional, memorable climax, using unanswered questions and unverified suspicions to scare the audience instead of jump scares. It does have some genuinely frightening moments (including a Breaking Bad-esque killing which is both one of the best and worst parts of the film), but, unlike other horror-suspense films, does not go overkill with them…at least, until the end.
While you do not have to have watched the original Cloverfield to see 10 Cloverfield Lane, it does help the ending make more sense. I predicted what was coming, but I still found it jarring and overly long. It feels like they should have picked a project with those elements already incorporated into it, instead of forcing them so it can fit the Cloverfield label. Other than the ending, however, 10 Cloverfield Lane is highly enjoyable. I would recommend it to anyone looking for a well-written, well-acted blend of psychological and physical horror\suspense. 
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    July 2013
    June 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.