Cinemablography@gmail.com
Cinemablography
  • Home
  • About
  • Journal
    • Existentialism in Film >
      • The Existential Philosophy of Melancholia
      • The Philosophy of Camus in The Dead Don't Die
      • The Existentialist Subtext of Dear Evan Hansen
      • An Existentialist Reading of "The Turin Horse"
    • A Woman's Perspective: Gender, and Identity in the Romanian New Wave
    • Film Theory Issue 1
    • Film Theory Issue 2
    • Science Fiction
    • Science Fiction Issue 2
    • Pan's Labyrinth
    • Kathryn Bigelow >
      • Opening Scene
      • Supermarket Scene
      • Round Table Discussion
  • Blog
  • Articles by Category
  • Contributors
  • Videographic Essays
  • Our Work
    • Links

88 mph: THE IRON GIANT

11/15/2012

1 Comment

 
Picture
The late 90's -- '98 and '99 specifically -- saw something of a resurgence in feature length animation. Sure, Disney/Pixar was dominating the field with A Bug's Life, Toy Story 2, Tarzan, and Mulan, but DreamWorks and Warner Brothers' animation studios were playing for keeps when they released The Prince of Egypt and The Iron Giant, respectively. The latter of the two was seen by almost no one due to a bungled promotional campaign on the part of Warner Brothers ("We did not have a fast-food component," as it was explained to the New York Times) which they knew would cause the film to underperform but didn't have a recourse to remedy it. So, amidst department restructuring and a lack-of-producer, Brad Bird (The Incredibles, Mission: Impossible -- Ghost Protocol) was given uncommon creative freedom to write and direct what has gone on to be considered one of the best animated films of all time. The Iron Giant's box office failure was not for lack of love. 

The film centers on 9-year-old Hogarth (Eli Marienthal) a loner kid who has no trouble passing time in the coastal town of Rockwell, Maine, as imaginative boys do. He and his mother (a war widow, voiced by Jennifer Aniston) live a quiet, private life together in 1957 until a giant iron "man" falls from the sky and Hogarth adopts him as his friend; he knows that the giant needs to remain a secret and hides him in his mother's barn. The giant, you see, is a weapon, though rendered inert via a dent on his head. In a heartfelt scene about identity, Hogarth reads comics-as-bedtime stories to the giant; he likes "Su-per-man" but becomes distressed when he sees a cover featuring a violent robot. Hogarth's earnest reassurance -- " you can be who you choose to be" -- becomes the emotional touchstone of the film, even echoing through supporting characters like Mansley (Christopher McDonald) and Dean (Harry Connick, Jr. in my favorite thing he has ever done). 

Neither Mansley nor Dean existed in the book the film is based on, The Iron Man by Ted Hughes. I haven't read the book, but the film's narrative benefitted from their inclusion so much that I cannot imagine the story without them. Hogarth's unlikely friendship with Dean -- a beatnik metal-working artist whose "live and let live" philosophies contrast nicely with the unrelenting tension of the outside world -- provides emotional respite for our heroes and the audience alike. After a reluctant start to their relationship, the pair find a rhythm of easy understanding that illustrates people's ability to connect through shared values despite being very different in all other respects. Housing the giant in Dean's junk yard lent itself to comedic moments as well as some of the best character development of the story; it is here that The Iron Giant's intelligence shines. Through Dean and Hogarth's interactions, mutual trust and respect push them both to make braver choices than would make on their own. Mansley, on the other hand, is Hogarth's immediate enemy: driven, singular, and reckless in his desire to "protect America at all costs." He sees people in black and white terms; forgets the possibility of innocence; has forgotten his own boyhood. Yet, Mansley is not the villain; he is a representation of what happens when people allow themselves to be primarily motivated by fear. 

About the Cold War setting Roger Ebert commented, "The movie is set in the 1950s because that's the decade when science fiction seemed most preoccupied with nuclear holocaust and invaders from outer space." The heightened sense of paranoia that was so pervasive at the time is the true villain of the film: unseen, lurking, oppressive. From classroom bomb shelter drills to Russia's Sputnik orbiting overhead, each individual citizen was acutely aware that times were tenuous at best. It was not unreasonable to be afraid. The emotional climax of the story, however, insists that peace is the harder, better goal; and as we see through Mansley's desperate actions, warfare is the coward's realm. 

Is this a kid's movie? Yes. It has enough charm and relatability in Hogarth that kids will not feel condescended to; there are plenty of visual gags and impressive action sequences; and the giant himself -- well... he's pretty cool. 

But is this just a kid's movie? Not at all. Refreshing stillness emanates from the straight-narrative format (versus musical numbers and splashy CGI animation). At one point in the film, Hogarth "suits up" with his army helmet and BB gun, ready to serve his country, and salutes himself in the mirror with all the intensity of a decorated vet; but he is just a boy with no concept of warfare. Despite it claiming his father's life, Hogarth still wholeheartedly emulates  his country. The contrast of boyhood hero idolization with messy real-world politics is simply irrelevant when faced with Hogarth's determination, and it is this kind of understated moment that elevates The Iron Giant beyond typical animated fare. Brad Bird and Tim McCanlies were prescient with their message that global community may trump old-fashioned nationalism, but it doesn't have to be at the expense of patriotism. The message continues to be poignant in our post-9/11 world -- a fact which might explain the film's cult status. 

Or, it could just be that good.  



1 Comment
Tara
11/15/2012 11:00:12 pm

"Refreshing stillness emanates from the straight-narrative format (versus musical numbers and splashy CGI animation)." ... This is one of the (aesthetic) reasons I love this movie so much; almost like in the way older movies had longer pauses and settled longer on the frames, having a different affect. I'm glad for the reminder of this movie!

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    July 2013
    June 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.